“…For the 22 research projects, a common practice was to tailor research processes to local contexts, perspectives, and norms. Several factors contributed to these efforts: the research team either had pre-established or developed new relationships with the community partner(s) prior to initiating the study and throughout the study 10 ; researchers often engaged in reflexivity, and grad students were supported/guided by a culturally competent, safe, and supportive supervisor(s) 11 ; researchers often participated in activities within the community 12 ; elders/respected community members were sought for guidance 13 ; (local) cultural protocols/methods (e.g., offering tobacco, smudging, traditional feasts, opening/closing prayers, Haudenosaunee consensus building, carrying out interviews in Anishinaabemowin, visions) were purposefully (not) incorporated into the research process, guided by Indigenous team members/knowledge holders/keepers 14 ; research teams and community partners predominately indicated that they incorporated a strengths-based approach into the project 15 ; when research teams used Western paradigms/methodologies for the research projects, they were philosophically congruent with Indigenous ways of knowing 16 ; Rand (2016), Robbins et al (2017), Ryan (2016), Vukic et al (2016), Webkamigad (2017), Wright (2019), Yap and Yu (2016), and Zehbe et al (2012) 18…”