2018
DOI: 10.3390/mps1010005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating CRISPR/Cas9-Derived Mutant Mice by Zygote Cytoplasmic Injection Using an Automatic Microinjector

Abstract: Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) assisted generation of mutant animals has become the method of choice for the elucidation of gene function in development and disease due to the shortened timelines for generation of a desired mutant, the ease of producing materials in comparison to other methodologies (such as embryonic stem cells, ESCs) and the ability to simultaneously target multiple genes in one injection session. Here we describe a step by step pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CRISPR-treated group was split to include five embryos treated with Tyr2F and five embryos treated with Tyr2R, while three untreated embryos from each of three control groups (“Cas9 only”, “No injection” and “Sham injection”) were also collected. Microinjections were performed into the cytoplasm of 1-cell zygotes[ 5 ], which were then briefly cultured to assess viability and then transferred into 0.5 day post coital (d.p.c) pseudopregnant females. Embryos in the “Sham injection” group were microinjected with water only, and the “Cas9 only” embryos were microinjected with Cas9 protein solution only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CRISPR-treated group was split to include five embryos treated with Tyr2F and five embryos treated with Tyr2R, while three untreated embryos from each of three control groups (“Cas9 only”, “No injection” and “Sham injection”) were also collected. Microinjections were performed into the cytoplasm of 1-cell zygotes[ 5 ], which were then briefly cultured to assess viability and then transferred into 0.5 day post coital (d.p.c) pseudopregnant females. Embryos in the “Sham injection” group were microinjected with water only, and the “Cas9 only” embryos were microinjected with Cas9 protein solution only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a). Microinjections were performed into the cytoplasm of 1-cell zygotes [5], which were then briefly cultured to assess viability and then transferred into 0.5 day post coital (d.p.c) pseudopregnant females. Embryos in the "Sham injection" group were microinjected with water only, and the "Cas9 only" embryos were microinjected with Cas9 protein only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transgenic mice (C57BL/6J) were generated using CRISPR-Cas9 injection and electroporation after isolation of early embryos ( 74 ). For generating Otud5 knock-in mutations, we used a guide RNA (gRNA) p.Gly494Ser 5′-CACCCTGTGCACCAGGTCAG-3′, and for p.Leu352Pro, we used gRNA 5′-CCCCTGGCTTAAATGACGGT-3′ with repair templates including the specific missense mutation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%