1988
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.37.4557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating quantum energy bounds by the moment method: A linear-programming approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most famous of these was the notoriously difficult, strong coupling, singular perturbation problem corresponding to determining the ground state binding energy of the quadratic Zeeman effect for super-strong magnetic fields (of the type encountered in neutron stars). Handy et al [24,25] were able to extend the EMM analysis to such problems confirming, through tight bounds, the results of Le Guillou and Zinn-Justin [26] derived through more sophisticated, analytical methods.…”
Section: Preliminariessupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most famous of these was the notoriously difficult, strong coupling, singular perturbation problem corresponding to determining the ground state binding energy of the quadratic Zeeman effect for super-strong magnetic fields (of the type encountered in neutron stars). Handy et al [24,25] were able to extend the EMM analysis to such problems confirming, through tight bounds, the results of Le Guillou and Zinn-Justin [26] derived through more sophisticated, analytical methods.…”
Section: Preliminariessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…An alternative approach (for multidimensional systems) is to use LUdecomposition methods on the (multidimensional) Hankel moment matrix (for the weight), in order to generate the same orthogonal polynomials [39]. One interesting application of this is to use EMM [20,24,25] to determine the power moments of the physical (positive) bosonic ground state (through tight bounds), for a given system. These can then be incorporated within OPPQ to generate the discrete state energies for all of the desired discrete states.…”
Section: Oppq and Hd: General Quantization Strategies Motivated By Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see Curto and Fialkow [43] or Handy et al [46]. Finally, for ease of notation in Section 2, we define:…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This revealed the anomalous kink behavior of the ν-moment equation for the QES states; however the focus of that first work was on bounding the non-QES energies for the ground and first excited states. In subsequent works [15,16] Handy was able to transform the nonlinear version of EMM into an equivalent linear programming based formulation which allowed for its implementation to a broad range of multidimensional systems, including the notoriously difficult quadratic Zeeman effect for superstrong magnetic fields [15,16]. The relevance of moment representations for quantizing singular perturbation-strongly coupled systems had been previously noted by Handy [22], in the context of finding a more rigorous alternative to lattice high temperature expansions in field theory.…”
Section: The Bessis Representation: Relevance Of the Eigenvalue Momenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of QES states as due to a nonuniform moment order structure was known to Handy and Bessis (HB) in the context of their development of the Eigenvalue Moment Method (EMM) [14][15][16], the first application of semidefinite programming (SDP) [17][18] in quantum physics. We ouline the relevant history since it impacts this work, and underscores the importance of moment representations for quantizing physical systems.…”
Section: The Bessis Representation: Relevance Of the Eigenvalue Momenmentioning
confidence: 99%