2019
DOI: 10.1002/cpmb.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generating Single Cell–Derived Knockout Clones in Mammalian Cells with CRISPR/Cas9

Abstract: CRISPR/Cas9 technology enables the rapid generation of loss‐of‐function mutations in a targeted gene in mammalian cells. A single cell harboring those mutations can be used to establish a new cell line, thereby creating a CRISPR‐induced knockout clone. These clonal cell lines serve as crucial tools for exploring protein function, analyzing the consequences of gene loss, and investigating the specificity of biological reagents. However, the successful derivation of knockout clones can be technically challenging… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These relatively small deletions (<300 bp) generate minimal genome perturbation when compared with approaches using a pair of gRNAs targeting sequences located in different exons many kilo-bases apart, resulting in deletion of large intragenic regions, in less predictable editing outcome and in possible interference with gene regulatory sequences. [32][33][34] This strategy is amenable to the study of essential genes, as the cells can be used for biological assay or to derive omics datasets quite early after the CRISPR process (i.e., prior to the induction of cell death). It is also applicable to primary cells, especially when using synthetic gRNAs that are less cytotoxic since they do not induce a strong antiviral response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These relatively small deletions (<300 bp) generate minimal genome perturbation when compared with approaches using a pair of gRNAs targeting sequences located in different exons many kilo-bases apart, resulting in deletion of large intragenic regions, in less predictable editing outcome and in possible interference with gene regulatory sequences. [32][33][34] This strategy is amenable to the study of essential genes, as the cells can be used for biological assay or to derive omics datasets quite early after the CRISPR process (i.e., prior to the induction of cell death). It is also applicable to primary cells, especially when using synthetic gRNAs that are less cytotoxic since they do not induce a strong antiviral response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be accomplished by using more than two plates per transfection. This protocol uses an adaptation of methods previously described (Giuliano, Lin, Girish, & Sheltzer, 2019). The use of the strainer is optional, but when using it, we have observed a higher frequency of isolating single-cell-derived colonies as opposed to doublet-cell-derived colonies.…”
Section: Single Cell Isolation Of Base Edited Cells Using Dilution Plmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, comparing genes identified to be essential using either BAGEL or MAGECK RRE revealed strong agreement with few essential genes private to each software (Supplementary In a final step, we asked how differences in editing efficiency, the number of sgRNAs per gene as well as potential clonality effects might affect the determination of gene essentiality. We were especially interested in differences in gene essentiality between the Cas9 bulk cell line and the two Cas9 single cell clones populations, since the generation of single cell clones from bulk populations forces cells to go through a genetic bottleneck, which might favor certain genetic alterations (Giuliano et al 2019) and thus dependencies. Therefore, we used BAGEL (Hart and Moffat 2016) to analyze depleted genes in each HAP1 cell line using the combined HD CRISPR library (8 sgRNAs per gene) and the individual sub-libraries A and B.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%