2014
DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2013.11.0038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation and Characterization of a Sugarbeet Transcriptome and Transcript‐Based SSR Markers

Abstract: Sugarbeet is a major source of refined sucrose and increasingly grown for biofuel production. Demand for higher productivity for this crop requires greater knowledge of sugarbeet physiology, pathology, and genetics, which can be advanced by the development of new genomic resources. Towards this end, a sugarbeet transcriptome of expressed genes from leaf and root tissues at varying stages of development and production, and after elicitation with jasmonic acid (JA) or salicylic acid (SA), was constructed and use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From these libraries, 283 differentially expressed unigenes were identified in JA-treated roots 2 d after treatment, and 326 differentially expressed unigenes were identified in JA-treated roots 60 d after treatment (Table 2). Of the differentially expressed unigenes, approximately 65% were up-regulated and 35% were down-regulated by JA at both 2 and 60 d. From a BLASTx search against GenBank nr, Swiss-Prot, COG, and KEGG protein databases (Fugate et al, 2014), 139 (49%) of the differentially expressed unigenes 2 d after JA treatment and 178 (54%) of the differentially expressed unigenes 60 d after treatment were annotated. Most annotations indicated putative functions for unigenes.…”
Section: Differential Expression Of Sugarbeet Root Unigenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From these libraries, 283 differentially expressed unigenes were identified in JA-treated roots 2 d after treatment, and 326 differentially expressed unigenes were identified in JA-treated roots 60 d after treatment (Table 2). Of the differentially expressed unigenes, approximately 65% were up-regulated and 35% were down-regulated by JA at both 2 and 60 d. From a BLASTx search against GenBank nr, Swiss-Prot, COG, and KEGG protein databases (Fugate et al, 2014), 139 (49%) of the differentially expressed unigenes 2 d after JA treatment and 178 (54%) of the differentially expressed unigenes 60 d after treatment were annotated. Most annotations indicated putative functions for unigenes.…”
Section: Differential Expression Of Sugarbeet Root Unigenesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A B Table 1 Primer sequences used for qPCR analysis of select sugarbeet genes. Unigene numbers correspond to the unigenes identified in a sugarbeet transcriptome (Fugate, 2013;Fugate et al, 2014). Multiple unigene numbers are presented for unigenes that coalign to different portions of the same gene as determined by alignment of unigenes to the sugarbeet genome (Dohm et al, 2014).…”
Section: Figure Captionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discovery of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) plays key roles in the studies of disease treatment, genetics and evolution in animal and plant breeding. 2 The availability of high-throughput sequencing methods has led to the discovery of thousands to millions of SNPs in diverse organisms, particularly humans, model experimental organisms and agriculturally important plants and animals. Since SNPs provide a powerful tool for the discovery of high-risk groups, identication of disease genes, design and testing of drugs and basic biological research, they have become important in the application of the Human Genome Project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amongst these, microsatellites have always been a matter of choice as they are hyper variable, multiallelic, codominantly inherited, reproducible and abundant, besides being the most appropriate tool to describe genetic diversity at DNA level (Kalia et al, 2011). Several sugar beet specific polymorphic genomic and EST-SSR markers (Mörchen et al, 1996;McGrath et al, 2007;Richards et al, 2004;Smulders et al, 2010) and transcript-based SSR markers (Fugate et al, 2014) have been developed. Despite the availability of such vast literature on the development of SSR markers in sugar beet, their actual use in genetic diversity analysis of elite sugar beet germplasm is limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%