2001
DOI: 10.1006/abio.2001.5235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation and Refinement of Peptide Mimetic Ligands for Paratope-Specific Purification of Monoclonal Antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These fragments are ideally suited for some therapeutic (Kontermann et al, 1997) and diagnostic Power and Hudson, 2000) applications where better tissue penetration and rapid clearance from the body are required, and can be used per se or reconstituted into a fully human antibody molecule. Affinity ligands binding specifically to the Fab fragments of immunoglobulins have been produced and comprise anti-antibodies raised against the immunoglobulin of interest (Huse et al, 2002), molecules interacting with CDR regions (antigen or epitope/mimotope peptides; Murray et al, 2001) or with constant framework moieties (PpL; Vola et al, 1995). However, biological affinity ligands are limited by high-cost of production and purification, limited life cycles and low scale-up potential (Lowe et al, 2001;Gulich et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These fragments are ideally suited for some therapeutic (Kontermann et al, 1997) and diagnostic Power and Hudson, 2000) applications where better tissue penetration and rapid clearance from the body are required, and can be used per se or reconstituted into a fully human antibody molecule. Affinity ligands binding specifically to the Fab fragments of immunoglobulins have been produced and comprise anti-antibodies raised against the immunoglobulin of interest (Huse et al, 2002), molecules interacting with CDR regions (antigen or epitope/mimotope peptides; Murray et al, 2001) or with constant framework moieties (PpL; Vola et al, 1995). However, biological affinity ligands are limited by high-cost of production and purification, limited life cycles and low scale-up potential (Lowe et al, 2001;Gulich et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that these Mab's react with a peptide (PDTRPAP), which after coupling to Sepharose proved to be an efficient adsorbent for Mabrecovery, from either hybridoma tissue cultures (154,155) or ascites fluids (156). A peptide mimotope (mimicking a non-proteinaceous antigen) has been further generated by combined biological (phage display) and chemical combinatorial techniques for paratopespecific purification of Mab's (157).…”
Section: Peptidic Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although immunoassays are still the preferred choice [18], in cases where original antigens of the antibodies are not readily accessible, mimotopes can be used as surrogates. Mimotopes have been used for the development of new diagnostics [5, 19, 20], therapeutics [21–24], vaccines [25–28], and as ligands for affinity chromatography applications [29, 30]. In this context the MimoDB database, established to collect information and sequences derived from biopanning results of random libraries, lists more than 15000 target specific peptide sequences binding to more than 1300 target structures (http://immunet.cn/) [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%