1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00950.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generation of Escherichia coli intimin derivatives with differing biological activities using site‐directed mutagenesis of the intimin C‐terminus domain

Abstract: SummaryIntimins, encoded by eae genes, are outer membrane proteins involved in attaching-effacing (A/E) lesion formation and host cell invasion by pathogenic bacteria, including enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and Citrobacter rodentium. A series of intimins, harbouring specific mutations close to the Cterminus, were constructed using pCVD438, which encodes the eae gene from EPEC strain E2348/69. These mutant plasmids were introduced into EPEC strain CVD206 and C. rodentium strain DBS255, which both co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Two unique restriction endonuclease sites located in pCVD438 were used, a conserved Sal I site located upstream of the Int280 domain (position 1663 of the eae gene) and an Eag I site located downstream of the TAA stop codon and within the pACYC184 vector plasmid (Frankel et al , 1998). The DNA fragment between the Sal I site and the 3′ end of the eae gene encoding intimin β from CR strain ICC169 was amplified by PCR using a forward primer (CReaefor2 5′-CCGTTCTGTCGAATGGTCAAGTAG-3′) and a CR eae β -derived reverse primer overlapping the end of the gene and including an Eag I restriction site (CReaerev1EagI 5′- CGGCCG TACACAGAATTATGGACAGTCCCG-3′).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1. Two unique restriction endonuclease sites located in pCVD438 were used, a conserved Sal I site located upstream of the Int280 domain (position 1663 of the eae gene) and an Eag I site located downstream of the TAA stop codon and within the pACYC184 vector plasmid (Frankel et al , 1998). The DNA fragment between the Sal I site and the 3′ end of the eae gene encoding intimin β from CR strain ICC169 was amplified by PCR using a forward primer (CReaefor2 5′-CCGTTCTGTCGAATGGTCAAGTAG-3′) and a CR eae β -derived reverse primer overlapping the end of the gene and including an Eag I restriction site (CReaerev1EagI 5′- CGGCCG TACACAGAATTATGGACAGTCCCG-3′).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DNA fragment between the Sal I site and the 3′ end of the eae gene encoding intimin β from CR strain ICC169 was amplified by PCR using a forward primer (CReaefor2 5′-CCGTTCTGTCGAATGGTCAAGTAG-3′) and a CR eae β -derived reverse primer overlapping the end of the gene and including an Eag I restriction site (CReaerev1EagI 5′- CGGCCG TACACAGAATTATGGACAGTCCCG-3′). The amplified eae fragment, flanked by Sal I and Eag I restriction sites, was used to replace the corresponding fragments of pCVD438 as previously described (Frankel et al , 1998) (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the variability in sample properties between donors and results is far greater than in cell line models. The IVOC system has been used to study EPEC-host specificity and tissue tropism (Girard et al 2005;Mundy et al 2007), Tir-intimin-dependent colonization and A/E lesion formation (Frankel et al 1998a;Schüller et al 2007;Frankel and Phillips 2008). The polarized IVOC method has shown that apical EPEC infection of duodenal mucosa results in a flagellin-dependent increase in IL-8 levels (Schüller et al 2009).…”
Section: In Vitro Infection Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A final line of evidence that suggests that intimin may have a host cell surface receptor other than Tir comes from mutational analysis of the host cell binding domain of intimin-␣. Mutations in this region of the adhesin disrupt the capacity of the bacteria to adhere to the host cell but do not interfere with the in vitro interaction between intimin and Tir (32,33). If Tir functions as the sole intimin receptor, such mutations should not affect bacterial adherence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%