2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi7030084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generative Street Addresses from Satellite Imagery

Abstract: Abstract:We describe our automatic generative algorithm to create street addresses from satellite images by learning and labeling roads, regions, and address cells. Currently, 75% of the world's roads lack adequate street addressing systems. Recent geocoding initiatives tend to convert pure latitude and longitude information into a memorable form for unknown areas. However, settlements are identified by streets, and such addressing schemes are not coherent with the road topology. Instead, we propose a generati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…to extract realistic representations. Following the example-based generation idea, another approach is to use already existing data resources, such as aerial images [37,38], or geostationary satellite images [26,58]. Similar approaches extract road networks using neural networks for dynamic environments [53] from LiDAR data [59], using line integrals [32] and using image processing approaches [43,55].…”
Section: Road Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…to extract realistic representations. Following the example-based generation idea, another approach is to use already existing data resources, such as aerial images [37,38], or geostationary satellite images [26,58]. Similar approaches extract road networks using neural networks for dynamic environments [53] from LiDAR data [59], using line integrals [32] and using image processing approaches [43,55].…”
Section: Road Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the experiments of [26] and [37], we explored our baseline approach to follow some state-of-the-art deep learning models [19,24,28,44]. In contrast to those approaches, our dataset is more diverse, spanning three countries with significant changes in topology and climate; and significantly larger in area and size.…”
Section: Road Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the segmentation task is to label the middle of the roads, allowing for identification and classification of roads at a finer level. We compare the performances of the following models: • U-Net: The baseline model, which resorts to a standard U-Net architecture that is commonly used in the context of road detection scenarios [14]. The model operates on data from a single timestamp of high quality (very few clouds in the test set; the tenth scene in the sequence of the twelve scenes, corresponding to June 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Special Issue assembles six novel contributions in different areas of GeoData-driven machine learning. Topics span different disciplines of GIScience: generation of street address from satellite imagery [1], land-cover classification of polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (PolSAR) images [2], extraction of buildings from maps to perform generalization [3], land-cover classification from satellite image time series [4], automatic selection of buildings based on cartographic constraints [5] and satellite image retrieval and recommendation [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to tackling different applications, the papers employ a variety of machine learning tools to accomplish their goals. Deep learning is used in two works [1,4]: in the former, a convolutional neural network extracts roads from satellite images as an initial step to generate street addresses, while in the latter, a sequential convolutional recurrent neural network provides robust end-to-end land-cover and land-use mapping from satellite image time series. Decision trees in the form of single decision trees [3] or random forests [2] are used for building detection in the first and land-cover classification in the second contribution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%