2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/itsc55140.2022.9921838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic Approach to Optimized Placement of Smart Roadside Infrastructure Sensors Using 3D Digital Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches consider the problem of monitoring a 3-D space, but with significant limitations affecting the applicability of these approaches to localizing small UAVs in large critical areas, such as those considered here. In [5], [11], [14], [27], [28], and [29], the candidate points for placement all lie on a 3-D surface; in [3], [4], [30], [31], [32], and [33], admissible sensor positions or points to be monitored (or both) belong to finite sets in the 3-D space. In particular, in most existing 3-D approaches, the RoI is discretized in cells.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches consider the problem of monitoring a 3-D space, but with significant limitations affecting the applicability of these approaches to localizing small UAVs in large critical areas, such as those considered here. In [5], [11], [14], [27], [28], and [29], the candidate points for placement all lie on a 3-D surface; in [3], [4], [30], [31], [32], and [33], admissible sensor positions or points to be monitored (or both) belong to finite sets in the 3-D space. In particular, in most existing 3-D approaches, the RoI is discretized in cells.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infrastructural LiDAR data can further be extended with point clouds recorded by vehicles. There are several papers for this extended task [11,41,42], which work with simulated data or the DAIR-V2X dataset [10]. Further works in this direction have been published, but since this deviates from the task of this work, we will leave it at this point with this selection.…”
Section: D Object Detection With Infrastructural Lidar Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the ego-vehicle-based data for training would be a big domain shift to this setup. Although there are public datasets with infrastructural sensors [7][8][9][10], these are rather limited in availability, size and quality [11,12]. Furthermore, due to the domain shift, it is not possible to use these for training and direct inference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Qu et al [20] proposed implementing the environment in a simulation and placing sensors, designating candidate locations, and optimizing them using the point cloud projected on the road surface while excluding buildings, sidewalks, etc. L. Kloeker et al [21] proposed optimizing lidar placement in infrastructure by utilizing a 3D digital map. They divided the road into triangles based on the OpenDRIVE [22] format map and optimized lidar placement by considering the number of points projected onto these triangles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%