2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apal.2018.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Generic expansion and Skolemization in NSOP 1 theories

Abstract: We study expansions of NSOP 1 theories that preserve NSOP 1 . We prove that if T is a model complete NSOP 1 theory eliminating the quantifier ∃ ∞ , then the generic expansion of T by arbitrary constant, function, and relation symbols is still NSOP 1 . We give a detailed analysis of the special case of the theory of the generic L-structure, the model companion of the empty theory in an arbitrary language L. Under the same hypotheses, we show that T may be generically expanded to an NSOP 1 theory with built-in S… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of Proposition 4.25 can be easily adjusted to take place over any set of parameters, instead of over the empty set. The equivalence of forking and dividing for complete types, but not for formulas, is yet another phenomenon that T m,n shares with the Henson graphs [9] and many NSOP 1 examples from [20]. On the other hand, there is an interesting difference between the present situation and that of the Henson graphs (which are not NSOP 1 ).…”
Section: Forking Independence and "Free Independence"mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The result of Proposition 4.25 can be easily adjusted to take place over any set of parameters, instead of over the empty set. The equivalence of forking and dividing for complete types, but not for formulas, is yet another phenomenon that T m,n shares with the Henson graphs [9] and many NSOP 1 examples from [20]. On the other hand, there is an interesting difference between the present situation and that of the Henson graphs (which are not NSOP 1 ).…”
Section: Forking Independence and "Free Independence"mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The following easy fact establishes strong finite character and witnessing for | ⌣ a (since any Morley sequence in a global invariant type is | ⌣ a -independent). See also [20,Lemma 2.7].…”
Section: Kim Forking Independencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We mention that Corollary 5.10 was independently discovered by Kruckman and Ramsey [6], who learned of the problem from an earlier unpublished version of this paper where it was posed as an open problem.…”
Section: The Definition Of a |mentioning
confidence: 86%