Generic Misalignment Aberration Patterns in Wide-Field Telescopes

Abstract

Axially symmetric telescopes produce well known "Seidel" off-axis third-order aberration patterns: coma, astigmatism, curvature of field and distortion. When axial symmetry is broken by the small misalignments of optical elements, additional third-order aberration patterns arise: one each for coma, astigmatism and curvature of field and two for distortion. Each of these misalignment patterns is characterized by an associated two-dimensional vector, each of which in turn is a linear combination of the tilt and decenter vectors of the individual optical elements. For an N-mirror telescope, 2(N-1) patterns must be measured to keep the telescope aligned. Alignment of the focal plane may require two additional patterns. For N = 3, as in a three mirror anastigmat, there is a two-dimensional "subspace of benign misalignment" over which the misalignment patterns for third-order coma, astigmatism and curvature of field are identically zero. One would need to measure at least one of the two distortion patterns to keep the telescope aligned. Alternatively, one might measure one of the fifth-order misalignment patterns, which are derived herein. But the fifth-order patterns are rather insensitive to misalignments, even with moderately wide fields, rendering them of relatively little use in telescope alignment. Another alternative would be to use telescope pointing as part of the alignment solution.Comment: 50 pages, 13 figures, Accepted for Publication in PAS

The Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy (VISTA): Design, technical overview, and performance

“…This condition essentially corresponds to the "subspace of benign misalignment" in the terminology of Schechter & Levinson (2011), and the bullseye above provides a convenient geometrical interpretation for the VIRCAM case.…”

Shack-Hartmann sensor based optical quality testing of whole slide imaging systems for digital pathology

“…This could subsequently be used to modify the alignment of the optical system in such a way as to minimize the overall level of aberrations or for testing the quality of individual optical components (objective lens, tube lens). Several studies have been carried out to develop a theory of misalignment effects on the full-field aberration maps, mostly for aligning telescopes for astronomy applications [3][4][5][6]. Here, we present details of a technique to adapt the Shack-Hartmann test for measuring the full-field aberration map of a WSI system, and we present an analysis of the fullfield aberration maps for revealing different misalignment root causes such as decenter and tilt of optical components.…”

James Webb Space telescope optical simulation testbed: experimental results with linear control alignment

“…It is using a Maximum A Posterior estimator [11], [12] to extract the phase information from focus-diverse imagery. This estimator integrates a regularization on the aberrations based on Bayesian interpretation.…”