2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Analysis of Growth Traits in Polled Nellore Cattle Raised on Pasture in Tropical Region Using Bayesian Approaches

Abstract: Components of (co)variance and genetic parameters were estimated for adjusted weights at ages 120 (W120), 240 (W240), 365 (W365) and 450 (W450) days of Polled Nellore cattle raised on pasture and born between 1987 and 2010. Analyses were performed using an animal model, considering fixed effects: herd-year-season of birth and calf sex as contemporary groups and the age of cow as a covariate. Gibbs Samplers were used to estimate (co)variance components, genetic parameters and additive genetic effects, which acc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
12
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
12
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To the authors knowledge, there is no comparable experimental information about the performance of adult animals in the study region, but it supports, the limited number of available on ranch observations. Thus, given the fact that irrespective of the year, all studied cattle were subject to a similar commercial management considerations, differences in LW performance most likely reflects a variability and/or interaction amongst environmental conditions (Domínguez et al 2003;; growth traits, including compensatory gains (Hernández-Hernández et al 2015); genetic parameters and their interacting networks (Ceacero et al 2016;Lopes et al 2013;Pereira et al 2016); hormones secretion (Kasuya 2016; Widmann et al 2013); maternal effects (Neidhardt et al 1979); grazing management (Vera and Ramírez-Restrepo 2017); diet selection (O'Neill et al 2013); nutritive and metabolic trigger factors in the forage resources (Tedeschi et al 2014); and the adaptive capacity of Brahman and Belmont Red Composite to respond to those triggers within a climate change environment (Ramírez-Restrepo and Charmley 2015). In parallel, a particularly relevant aspect is that putting weight on cull cows in thin to medium condition has been found to be more profitable than cows with higher body scores (Amadou et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the authors knowledge, there is no comparable experimental information about the performance of adult animals in the study region, but it supports, the limited number of available on ranch observations. Thus, given the fact that irrespective of the year, all studied cattle were subject to a similar commercial management considerations, differences in LW performance most likely reflects a variability and/or interaction amongst environmental conditions (Domínguez et al 2003;; growth traits, including compensatory gains (Hernández-Hernández et al 2015); genetic parameters and their interacting networks (Ceacero et al 2016;Lopes et al 2013;Pereira et al 2016); hormones secretion (Kasuya 2016; Widmann et al 2013); maternal effects (Neidhardt et al 1979); grazing management (Vera and Ramírez-Restrepo 2017); diet selection (O'Neill et al 2013); nutritive and metabolic trigger factors in the forage resources (Tedeschi et al 2014); and the adaptive capacity of Brahman and Belmont Red Composite to respond to those triggers within a climate change environment (Ramírez-Restrepo and Charmley 2015). In parallel, a particularly relevant aspect is that putting weight on cull cows in thin to medium condition has been found to be more profitable than cows with higher body scores (Amadou et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gunawan et al (2011b) considered that this might be partly a correlated response to selection for increased daily gain. A possible cause of the undesirable trend in gestation length and of the marked fluctuation of values observed for AFC, CI, and DO could be the intense selection to increase productive traits (Lopes et al, 2011;Santos et al, 2012;Lopes et al, 2013), without giving attention to reproductive traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, GS has been reported to be more suitable than REML analyses for the analysis of complicated models, as it can obtain and update all information from the posterior probability distribution without solving the mixed model equations (Gianola and Fernando, 1986;Van Tassell et al, 1995). Therefore, the GS method is increasingly used to estimate the genetic parameters of quantitative traits (Waldmann and Ericsson, 2006;Pardo et al, 2013), such as BW in cattle (Lundgren et al, 2014), feed intake and litter weight in sows (Lopes et al, 2013), and egg production in chicken (Luo et al, 2007). In this study, a comparison of the estimates obtained using the REML and GS methods were determined to be similar; this was consistent with the results obtained in other studies (Van Tassell and Van Vleck, 1996;Andersen-Ranberg et al, 2005;Stock et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%