2019
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-14838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic analysis of udder conformation traits derived from automatic milking system recording in dairy cows

Abstract: Cartesian teat coordinates measured by automatic milking systems (AMS) provide new opportunities to record udder conformation traits and to study changes in udder conformation genetically and phenotypically within and between parities. The objective of this study was to estimate heritabilities and repeatabilities of AMS-based udder conformation traits within parities, to estimate genetic correlations between parities for AMS-based udder conformation traits, and to estimate genetic correlations between AMS-base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Genetic correlation to udder conformation would therefore call for further studies. Important udder conformation traits may also be based on teat coordinate data from AMS (Byskov et al, 2012;Carlström et al, 2016;Poppe et al, 2019). Heritabilities of pKO, pIM, and pTNF (0.12-0.14) are sufficient to obtain genetic progress if properly weighted in a selection scheme, and the genetic correlation shows that pIM and pTNF must be regarded as identical traits.…”
Section: Genetic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic correlation to udder conformation would therefore call for further studies. Important udder conformation traits may also be based on teat coordinate data from AMS (Byskov et al, 2012;Carlström et al, 2016;Poppe et al, 2019). Heritabilities of pKO, pIM, and pTNF (0.12-0.14) are sufficient to obtain genetic progress if properly weighted in a selection scheme, and the genetic correlation shows that pIM and pTNF must be regarded as identical traits.…”
Section: Genetic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes a more frequent sampling of milk components (fat, protein, lactose, milk urea nitrogen, and somatic cell counts) and activity monitoring to identify changes in cow behavior associated with the onset of estrus, lameness, or disease and integration of real-time farm-level information (e.g., feed composition and weather). Alternative information about health comes from data recorded by automatic milking systems and electronic milking systems, such as milk yield per milking (Poppe et al, 2020), udder and teat characteristics (Poppe et al, 2019), or other electronic devices, such as sensors or cameras (Song et al, 2019). A recent, multi-institutional effort to develop a "Virtual Dairy Farm Brain" has been organized by Liang et al (2018) in order to combine expertise from scientists, dairy producers, and industry professionals for the purpose of improving whole-farm decision-making.…”
Section: On-farm Analyticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacobs and Siegford (2012a) argued that automatic sensors can memorize highly rich data sets regarding mammary health, daily and milking production, rumination time, and feed consumption in the AMS. Poppe, Mulder, Ducro and De Jong (2019) pointed out that cartesian teat coordinates measured by AMS provide new opportunities to record udder conformation characteristics, allowing studies on genetic and phenotypic changes within and between parities. For Hansen (2015), more data on herds can stimulate interest by ranchers in dairy production, but in many cases, they find themselves drowned in data.…”
Section: Information Management and Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%