2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11627-011-9407-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and epigenetic relationship in rye, Secale cereale L., somaclonal variation within somatic embryo-derived plants

Abstract: In vitro regenerated plants of rye, Secale cereale L., Ailés and Merced cultivars, were studied to verify if genetic and/or epigenetic changes were promoted by in vitro conditions. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) fingerprints on HpaII/MspI-digested and uncut DNA were generated. DNA digested with methylation-sensitive isoschizomers revealed epigenetic modifications, while modification of ISSR patterns obtained with undigested DNA indicated genetic changes. With this technique, it was possible to study both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with previous studies that assessed specific genomic regions (Kaeppler and Phillips 1993;Zhang et al 2009;Linacero et al 2011;Gonzalez (Stroud et al 2013). The bulk of DNA methylation is not affected by tissue culture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are consistent with previous studies that assessed specific genomic regions (Kaeppler and Phillips 1993;Zhang et al 2009;Linacero et al 2011;Gonzalez (Stroud et al 2013). The bulk of DNA methylation is not affected by tissue culture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Instead, the more stochastic hypermethylation events may explain some of the somaclonal variation observed following tissue culture. Our results are consistent with previous studies that assessed specific genomic regions (Kaeppler and Phillips 1993;Zhang et al 2009;Linacero et al 2011;Gonzalez The bulk of DNA methylation is not affected by tissue culture. However, a subset of genomic regions exhibit altered DNA methylation levels.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our data are congruent with the MSAP studies of genomic DNA methylation changes performed between rye donor plants and their regenerants where the level of demethylation was greater for the regenerants (González et al 2013). Similar results were obtained also in rye using HpaII and MspI digested DNA amplified with ISSR markers (Linacero et al 2011). It was demonstrated that the decrease in DNA methylation at the level of regenerants may be caused by the necessity of genes activation during cell reprogramming to facilitate plant regeneration (Kaeppler and Phillips 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To study the extent of changes induced by tissue culture and inherited by the progeny different methods have been used (Hossain et al 2003;Peredo et al 2009;Linacero et al 2011;Díaz-Martínez et al 2012). Most of them involved isoschizomers differing in their sensitivity towards DNA methylation sites (Ochogavía et al 2009;Wang et al 2013;Machczyńska et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several bases for somaclonal variation have been proposed, which include changes in chromosome number (Mujib et al 2007; Leva et al 2012), point mutations (D’Amato 1985; Ngezahayo et al 2007), somatic crossing over and sister chromatid exchange (Duncan 1997; Bairu et al 2011), chromosome breakage and rearrangement (Czene and Harms-Ringdahl 1995; Alvarez et al 2010), somatic gene rearrangement, DNA amplification (Karp 1995; Tiwari et al 2013), changes in organelle DNA (Cassells and Curry 2001; Bartoszewski et al 2007), DNA methylation (Guo et al 2007; Linacero et al 2011), epigenetic variation (Kaeppler et al 2000; Guo et al 2006; Smulders and de Klerk 2011), histone modifications and RNA interference (Miguel and Marum 2011), segregation of pre-existing chimeral tissue (Brar and Jain 1998; Vázquez 2001; Ravindra et al 2012; Nwauzoma and Jaja 2013) and insertion or excision of transposable elements (Gupta 1998; Sato et al 2011b). In particular, transposable elements are one of the causes of genetic rearrangements in in vitro culture (Hirochika et al 1996; Sato et al 2011a).…”
Section: Molecular Basis Of Somaclonal Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%