2021
DOI: 10.3390/ani11113106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic and Phenotypic Characterization of Domestic Geese (Anser anser) in Egypt

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to achieve phenotypic characterization of three domestic Egyptian goose populations collected from three different geographical zones (Kafr El-Sheikh, Fayoum and Luxor) and to perform genetic characterization of these three populations based on mtDNA D-loop and 12 microsatellite markers. The body measurements of 402 domestic mature geese belonging to these three governorates showed that the lengths of the head, culmen and tarsus and the live body weight varied significantly am… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the average number of alleles ranged from 1 to 4 with a range of N e form 1.00 to 2.90. This small range of N A probably explains the less genetic variation among the studied quail populations which might be explained by the small sample size of those quail populations that might predispose the genetic drift and inbreeding (Abdel-Kafy et al 2021 ). Although there were small N A and N e ranges which might indicate low genetic variation, the level of H O and H e varied from 0.00 to 0.75 without deviation from HWE in most of the studied quail populations indicating that these quail populations were in HWE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, the average number of alleles ranged from 1 to 4 with a range of N e form 1.00 to 2.90. This small range of N A probably explains the less genetic variation among the studied quail populations which might be explained by the small sample size of those quail populations that might predispose the genetic drift and inbreeding (Abdel-Kafy et al 2021 ). Although there were small N A and N e ranges which might indicate low genetic variation, the level of H O and H e varied from 0.00 to 0.75 without deviation from HWE in most of the studied quail populations indicating that these quail populations were in HWE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The genetic variation can be assessed depending on many genetic diversity indices such as the observed and the effective number of alleles ( N A and N e , respectively) as they give an indication on the difference in allele frequency in a population (Abdel-Kafy et al 2021 ). In this regard, the average number of alleles ranged from 1 to 4 with a range of N e form 1.00 to 2.90.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the average number of alleles ranged from 1 to 4 with a range of Ne was 1.00 to 2.90. This small range of NA probably explain the less genetic variation among the studied quail's populations which might be explained by the small sample size of those quail's populations, that might predispose the genetic drift and inbreeding [29]. Although there were small NA and Ne ranges which might indicate low genetic variation, the level of HO and He was high without deviation from HWE in most of studied quail's populations indicating that these quail's population were in HWE.…”
Section: Genetic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although there were small NA and Ne ranges which might indicate low genetic variation, the level of HO and He was high without deviation from HWE in most of studied quail's populations indicating that these quail's population were in HWE. However, the WW and WB quails had the lowest level of heterozygosity as con rmed by low values of Ho and a signi cant deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), which might indicate a possibility of a non-random mating and inbreeding in the WW and WB quails [29]. This was con rmed by the high positive values of heterozygosity de cit index (FIS).…”
Section: Genetic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation