2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00763.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic architecture of a wing size measure in Drosophila hibisci from two populations in eastern Australia

Abstract: Two models of evolutionary change invoke either additive genetic contributions to phenotypic traits (Fisher) or epistatic as well as additive effects (Wright). An earlier study of the flower-breeding Drosophila hibisci from two sites in eastern Australia reported additive and epistatic genetic effects as well as environmental effects on ovariole number. The present study of the same flies examines the genetic architecture of wing width, a trait that is correlated phenotypically with ovariole number and body si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the BW of MIP>TNT flies immediately after eclosion (day 0) was not different from that of controls, it was unlikely that silencing MIP neurons increased BW simply by promoting growth during development. Consistent with this idea, there was no difference between MIP>TNT and controls in the body length [13,14] and wing length [15] shortly after eclosion (Figures S1C and S1D). Furthermore, we examined whether adultspecific silencing of MIP neurons increases BW by combining tub-GAL80 ts that encodes a ubiquitously expressing temperature-sensitive GAL80 [16] with either MIP>TNT or MIP>impTNT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Because the BW of MIP>TNT flies immediately after eclosion (day 0) was not different from that of controls, it was unlikely that silencing MIP neurons increased BW simply by promoting growth during development. Consistent with this idea, there was no difference between MIP>TNT and controls in the body length [13,14] and wing length [15] shortly after eclosion (Figures S1C and S1D). Furthermore, we examined whether adultspecific silencing of MIP neurons increases BW by combining tub-GAL80 ts that encodes a ubiquitously expressing temperature-sensitive GAL80 [16] with either MIP>TNT or MIP>impTNT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…If recessive mutations accumulate at a rate higher in laboratory culture than they do in wild populations, we would expect dominance effects to be more apparent in populations that have been in laboratory culture for longer periods of time. An emerging pattern seems to agree with this prediction; there is a higher incidence of dominance in line‐cross studies involving long established laboratory populations (Gilchrist and Partridge 1999; Kennington et al 2001) compared to those based on freshly collected populations (Wolf et al 2000; Schiffer et al 2006; this study).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…To avoid recording residence times that are unlikely to be due to flies being arrested there by properties of the patch, the residence time was only established if the patch visit lasted for at least 30 s. As soon as the flies left the patch they were removed from the vials and put into fresh tubes inside an ice basin. A wing was removed from paralyzed individuals under the stereomicroscope and the length was measured and used as a proxy for their body size (Figure 2 ; Wolf et al, 2000 ). Then, flies were individually crushed in 1 mL saline (NaCl: 0.8%, Tween‐80: 0.01%) with a pestle in 2 mL tubes to collect yeast cells in/on the body as a proxy to yeast load of a fly (yeast load).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%