2016
DOI: 10.5376/mpb.2016.07.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Association Analysis and Selection Indices for Yield Attributing Traits in Available Chilli (<i>Capsicum annuum</i> L.) Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Days to ripe fruit maturity from anthesis was significantly but negatively correlated (r = -0.597**) with dry fruit yield/plant and days to 50% flowering was negatively correlated with dry fruit yield/plant. These results corroborated with the findings of earlier researchers (Rana et al, 2015, Elahi et al, 2017, Hasan et al, 2016and Maurya et al, 2017c indicating that early flowering and ripe fruit maturity leads to high dry fruit yield/plant. Seeds/fruit and 1000 seed weight were most contributing characters towards increased fruit weight as they were positively and significantly correlated with fruit weight and this result was supported by Chowdhary and Samadia (2004) and Sarkar (2006).…”
Section: Character Associationshipsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Days to ripe fruit maturity from anthesis was significantly but negatively correlated (r = -0.597**) with dry fruit yield/plant and days to 50% flowering was negatively correlated with dry fruit yield/plant. These results corroborated with the findings of earlier researchers (Rana et al, 2015, Elahi et al, 2017, Hasan et al, 2016and Maurya et al, 2017c indicating that early flowering and ripe fruit maturity leads to high dry fruit yield/plant. Seeds/fruit and 1000 seed weight were most contributing characters towards increased fruit weight as they were positively and significantly correlated with fruit weight and this result was supported by Chowdhary and Samadia (2004) and Sarkar (2006).…”
Section: Character Associationshipsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The value of selection index is determined by setting the weighting of each character according to its economic value (Cui et al 2020). The determination of selection characters and character's weighting coefficient can use multivariate analysis (Sabouri et al 2008;Hasan et al 2016;Kose et al 2018;Anshori et al 2019;Fadhli et al 2020;Farid et al 2021). Multivariate analysis can be used for multi variables so interpretation can be done easier (Janmohammadi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Productivity characters displayed as highly polygenic, and the environment also strongly influenced the stability of potential lines, especially in the early generations (Fritsche-Neto and DoVale, 2012; Kassahun et al, 2013;Faot et al, 2019). Therefore, the use of several characters related to productivity ascertained the best solution in the mutant lines selection, with the said concept reported in the soybean (Kachhadia et al, 2014;Teixeira et al, 2017;Bizari et al, 2017), chili (Hasan et al, 2016), sunflower (Kose et al, 2018), rice (Akbar et al, 2019;Anshori et al, 2021;Akbar et al, 2021), and maize (Fadhli et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%