2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-017-3363-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic connectivity in a herbivorous coral reef fish (Acanthurus leucosternon Bennet, 1833) in the Eastern African region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low genetic differentiation has been observed on Acanthurus leucosternon in Eastern Africa based on mitochondrial DNA and C. laticeps and Caffrogobius caffer, in South Africa (Neethling et al, 2008; Teske et al, 2010; Otwoma et al, 2018). Contrary results have been observed on fish of the same family, L. mahsena and Lethrinus harak , in the South West Indian Ocean (SWIO), which showed significant genetic differentiation and structuring of samples from different localities (Healey et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Low genetic differentiation has been observed on Acanthurus leucosternon in Eastern Africa based on mitochondrial DNA and C. laticeps and Caffrogobius caffer, in South Africa (Neethling et al, 2008; Teske et al, 2010; Otwoma et al, 2018). Contrary results have been observed on fish of the same family, L. mahsena and Lethrinus harak , in the South West Indian Ocean (SWIO), which showed significant genetic differentiation and structuring of samples from different localities (Healey et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Overall, the results of genetic homogeneity in A. triostegus are consistent with the findings of biophysical modeling of connectivity, which indicates that population connectivity in the WIO increases with increase in dispersal ability (Crochelet et al ., ; Mayorga‐Adame et al ., ). Genetic homogeneity in the WIO has also been observed in other reef fish such as Lutjanus kasmira (Forsskål 1775) (Muths et al ., ), Scarus ghobban Forsskål 1775 (Visram et al ., ), Amphiprion akallopisos Bleeker 1853 (Huyghe & Kochzius, ), Dascyllus trimaculatus (Rüppell 1829) (O'Donnell et al ., ) and Acanthurus leucosternon Bennet 1833 (Otwoma et al ., ). Nevertheless, the lack of structure found for A. triostegus in the WIO have to be interpreted with caution as the number of individuals analysed for this region is low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although there are currently no bonefish – or even elopomorph – larval dispersal models for the Indian Ocean, pelagic larval dispersal simulation models of coral species in the southwestern Indian Ocean corroborate the biogeographic break between Seychelles and Mauritius, suggesting connectivity is limited even when the pelagic larval duration is between 50–60 days [125, 134]. However, these models considered coral larvae, which are completely reliant on currents for their dispersal [122, 134, 135]. Whilst the dispersal behavior of A. glossodonta larvae is unknown, we speculate that, similar to eels (Anguillidae; which also have long pelagic larval durations), bonefishes could disperse greater distances than passive corals by having the ability to swim (e.g., Anguilla japonica [136]) or may even take part in vertical migrations (e.g., Anguilla japonica [137, 138]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%