2012
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2012.962.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Control and Location of QTLS Involved in Antioxidant Capacity and Fruit Quality Traits in Peach [Prunus Persica (L.) Batsch]

Abstract: In peach fruits, phenolic compounds serve as a major source of potential antioxidants which are known to play a significant role in fruit quality and in human wellbeing. This study was conducted in a F1 population derived from the cross 'Venus' x 'Big Top' nectarines in order to investigate the variability in the fruit antioxidant content and to study the genetic control and location of QTLs involved in fruit quality traits. Biochemical analyses have been performed to measure Lascorbic acid (vitamin C), total … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high level of polymorphism found with these markers might be explained since the ChillPeach database is a specialized collection of ESTs from peach mesocarp tissue subjected to cold storage and ripening. Additional data from the same population showed that the polymorphism in this population was ~50 % (Abidi et al, 2010), lower than the observed in TxE (~85 %), but higher than the observed for Pop-DG population (~25 %) (Ogundiwin et al, 2009b). The lower rate of polymorphism observed in VxBT and Pop-DG compared to TxE could be explained since TxE is a F 2 population from an interspecific cross.…”
Section: Linkage Mappingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The high level of polymorphism found with these markers might be explained since the ChillPeach database is a specialized collection of ESTs from peach mesocarp tissue subjected to cold storage and ripening. Additional data from the same population showed that the polymorphism in this population was ~50 % (Abidi et al, 2010), lower than the observed in TxE (~85 %), but higher than the observed for Pop-DG population (~25 %) (Ogundiwin et al, 2009b). The lower rate of polymorphism observed in VxBT and Pop-DG compared to TxE could be explained since TxE is a F 2 population from an interspecific cross.…”
Section: Linkage Mappingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Two preliminary studies carried out in the same population mapped 17 SSR markers on LG4 (Cantín et al 2010a) and six on LG6 (Abidi et al 2012). In the present map, LG4 includes a total of 36 markers, with 26 and 10 markers in the 'Venus' and 'Big Top' maps, respectively.…”
Section: Genetic Mapsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For mapping, we also selected genotypic data of six SSR markers previously evaluated in the same progeny (BPPCT025, BPPCT033, BINEPPCU6377, pchcms5, UCDCH15, and UDP98-024) (Cantín et al 2010a;Abidi et al 2012). …”
Section: Population Genotyping and Marker Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of SSR markers for Prunus persica and other species of the same genus are available for different purposes [30][31][32][33]. Data from study in Pop-DG population for fruit quality gene map of prunus showed that the polymorphism was ~50 % [34], lower than the observed in T×E (~85%), but higher than the observed for Pop-DG (~25%). The lower rate of polymorphism observed in 'Venus' × 'Big Top' (V×BT) and Pop-DG compared to T×E could be explained since T×E is a F2 population from an inter-specific cross.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%