1947
DOI: 10.1126/science.106.2756.379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Control of Lymphomatosis in the Fowl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The S-13 line was derived from the S-strain (Hutt and Cole, 1947) by selection of chickens homozygous for the B 13 alíele (Schat, unpublished data).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S-13 line was derived from the S-strain (Hutt and Cole, 1947) by selection of chickens homozygous for the B 13 alíele (Schat, unpublished data).…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1969;Schmittle andEidson 1968). On the other hand, strain K, which was selected for resistance to lymphomatosis by Hutt and Cole ( 1947 ) , was significantly more susceptible (P < 0.01) than four of nine strains. In contrast to this linding, Cole (1968) Purchase and Biggs (1967) who also found a significantly greater incidence of gonadal lesions in females than males of two strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Strains X, Y, and Z were three commercial egg strains. Strains S and K had been selected for susceptibility and resistance, respectively, to MD (Hutt and Cole 1947) at Cornell University. Great-grandparents of these chicks consisted of 260 females and 30 males derived from hatching eggs received from Corneil University.…”
Section: Materials and Metiiods Experimental Chickensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1926, Pappenheimer et al observed a breed difference in susceptibility to MD, and in 1932 Asmundson and Biely published the first study on the inheritance of resistance to MD. The feasibility of breeding chickens resistant to the disease was also demonstrated decades ago (Hutt and Cole, 1947); at that time natural exposure was employed. Although progress was made, major disadvantages with natural exposure to MD virus (MDV) were the long test period, the unmeasurability of the challenge and the unpredictability of the response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%