2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-55177-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Data Analysis for Plant and Animal Breeding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
171
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
171
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This model was then compared against several AR1 models accounting for spatial variation (Table 2). Note that this model assumes independence between each factor (Isik et al, 2017). Note that this model assumes independence between each factor (Isik et al, 2017).…”
Section: Spatial Corrections and Heritability Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model was then compared against several AR1 models accounting for spatial variation (Table 2). Note that this model assumes independence between each factor (Isik et al, 2017). Note that this model assumes independence between each factor (Isik et al, 2017).…”
Section: Spatial Corrections and Heritability Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critically, an ANOVA model fit in this context ignores GEI by assuming a uniform covariance between pairs of environments (Isik et al, 2017). Early GS studies performed in plants typically used multienvironment ANOVA models to calculate adjusted means for genotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ASReml Stand Alone program version 4.1 (VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK) was used to partition variance components in each breeding cycle. Additionally, broad-or narrow-sense heritability was calculated for each trait as appropriate, and standard errors were calculated with the Delta method [26]. Phenotypic correlations between traits were calculated using Genstat.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the AR1 X AR1 model requires a complete rectangular design and the fields were irregularly shaped, dummy entries containing no data were added to the data set to generate a rectangular design. Predicted values using the individual model were generated for each plant, based on the pedigree, [26] and selections were made based on these predicted values. In cases where full-sib families were planted, the interaction between mother and father was included as a random term in the model to remove non-additive variance from the predicted values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation