2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-012-1903-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic data provided by 21 autosomal STR loci from Chinese Tujia ethnic group

Abstract: The aim of this study was to investigate allelic frequency distribution and forensic genetic parameters of autosomal short tandem repeats (STR) loci of the population samples from 107 Tujia individuals from Chinese Hubei Province. Twenty-one autosomal STR genetic markers (D9S1122, D6S474, D6S1017, D5S2500, D4S2408, D3S4529, D2S441, D2S1776, D22S1045, D20S482, D1S1677, D1S1627, D1GATA113, D19S433, D18S853, D17S1301, D11S4463, D12ATA63, D10S1248, D10S1435 and D14S1434) were simultaneously amplified in a new mult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest HO, HE, PIC, TPI, PD and PE were observed at HLD 118 locus, and this locus was also found with the lowest polymorphism in other previously studied groups10. The combined power of exclusion (CPE) and discrimination (CPD) at the 30 InDel loci in the Tujia group were 0.9860 and 0.9999999999761, respectively; combined matching probability (CMP) value of 30 InDels in the group was 2.3894 × 10 −11 , higher than that in our previous study which reached 1.10974 × 10 −19 of 21 autosomal STRs in Tujia group11. According to our calculation, the value of CMP combining 30 InDels with 21 autosomal STRs reached 2.652 × 10 −30 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest HO, HE, PIC, TPI, PD and PE were observed at HLD 118 locus, and this locus was also found with the lowest polymorphism in other previously studied groups10. The combined power of exclusion (CPE) and discrimination (CPD) at the 30 InDel loci in the Tujia group were 0.9860 and 0.9999999999761, respectively; combined matching probability (CMP) value of 30 InDels in the group was 2.3894 × 10 −11 , higher than that in our previous study which reached 1.10974 × 10 −19 of 21 autosomal STRs in Tujia group11. According to our calculation, the value of CMP combining 30 InDels with 21 autosomal STRs reached 2.652 × 10 −30 .…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…However, there were some potential limitations of STRs in forensic applications because of its relatively high mutation rate, long amplicon size, and the deficiency in the analysis of highly degraded DNA samples and complex kinship cases. In recent years, a novel genetic marker: insertion and deletion polymorphisms (InDels) dispersing through the human genome showed some advantages, such as short amplicon size, low mutation rate, and practicability of being genotyped in the present forensic DNA lab platforms678, which were useful for forensic DNA applications (Supplementary method for STR applications), population genetics9101112, and biogeographic ancestry analysis131415. Population genetic and forensic validation studies have been performed using the Qiagen Investigator DIPplex ® reagent including 30 autosomal InDel loci plus amelogenin locus, and population data of Chinese Han, Tibetan, Uigur, Kazak, She, Xibe and Yi populations have been reported in previous studies910161718.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences were found between the Tujia (Yuan et al, 2012) and our study population at five loci (D14S1434, D20S482, D22S1045, D2S441, and D6S474). Between the Chinese Han population in Beijing (Guo et al, 2010) and our study population, differences were found at six loci (D10S1248, D10S1435, D19S433, D1GATA113, D4S2408, and D9S1122).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…F st values of Guangdong Han-Kazak, Bai-Mongolian, Bai-Hui, Bai-Tibetan, Bai-Uygur, Yi-Hui, Yi-Mongolian, Yi-Tibetan, Yi-Uygur, Salar-Mongolian, Kazak-Mongolian, Kazak-Hui, Kazak-Tibetan, were all above 0.15, showing great genetic differentiation. We also found that Inner Mongolia Mongolian, Ningxia Hui, Xinjiang Uygur, and Xizang Tibetan show moderate genetic differentiation (F st >0.1) with nine referenced ethnic groups [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Visual results are shown in Figure S2.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 57%
“…To estimate the genetic relationship between the five studied ethnic groups and other ethnic groups, available allele frequencies data of 6914 Han Chinese individuals (Guangxi Han [6], Guangdong Han [7], Hebei Han [8], Hunan Han [9]) and 1 715 minority individuals (Tujia [10], Bai [11], Yi [12], Salar [13], Kazak [14]) were referred. The detailed data source is listed in Table S1.…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%