2019
DOI: 10.5812/jjm.86120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Determinants of Resistance to Fusidic Acid Among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Jordan

Abstract: Background: Fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (FRSA) has been reported in many countries to have a remarkable difference in resistance determinants. Fusidic acid resistance is very important because it might lead to the failure of topical treatment, especially when it is used as empiric therapy. In addition, its resistance might be linked to other antibiotic resistances. The overall rate of fusidic acid resistance is still relatively low. However, there is an increase in the prevalence of clinical i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fusB determinant was detected in the least number (4.1%) of isolates in this study. In contrast, fusB was the most prevalent FA resistance determinant in MRSA isolated in Jordan [26], Wenzhou, China [27], and in some European countries due to an epidemic strain associated with outbreaks of impetigo bullosa infections and clonal expansion of the European CA-MRSA clone belonging to ST80 [7,8,13,24]. These reports highlight differences in the geographical distribution of FA resistance determinants in MRSA isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The fusB determinant was detected in the least number (4.1%) of isolates in this study. In contrast, fusB was the most prevalent FA resistance determinant in MRSA isolated in Jordan [26], Wenzhou, China [27], and in some European countries due to an epidemic strain associated with outbreaks of impetigo bullosa infections and clonal expansion of the European CA-MRSA clone belonging to ST80 [7,8,13,24]. These reports highlight differences in the geographical distribution of FA resistance determinants in MRSA isolates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The presence of mecA was determined by PCR using mecA-F (5'-AAA ATC GAT GGT AAA GGT TGG C-3') and mecA-R (5'-AGT TCT GCA GTA CCG GAT TTG C-3') primers (Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea). Then DNA fingerprinting of clinical isolates was conducted by standard spa typing technique (14). The polymorphic X region of protein A gene (15) was amplified from all MRSA isolates by using the primers spa-1113f (5′-TAA AGA CGA TCC TTC GGT GAG C-3′) and spa-1514r (5′-CAG CAG TAG TGC CGT TTG CTT-3′).…”
Section: Antimicrobial Resistance Detection and Molecular Typingmentioning
confidence: 99%