“…As a model for obtaining information on these questions, few species or species groups are as good as the species of the wheat group (species of the Triticurn-Aegilops group in its broadest sense, including cultivated and wild wheats and goatgrasses; Zohary, 1965). The wild species have fairly well defined distributions; morphotypes have been described; in most species populations of different sizes can be easily found; and information on genetic variation in some species is already known (Zohary & Imber, 1963;Riley, 1965;Zohary, 1965;Sears, 1969;Segal eta!., 1980;Brody & Mendlinger, 1980;Nevo et a!., 1982Nevo et a!., , 1988. *Correspondence In addition to the wheat group's importance in understanding the above, the wild species are also important for our ability to introgress their economically useful genes into cultivated wheat (Zohary et a!., 1969;Dvorak et a!., 1985;Cox et a!., 1990;Dyck et the Sitopsis group have been the focus of a number of studies which have produced several possible phylogeny trees (Morris & Sears, 1967;Johnson, 1975;Feldman & Kislev, 1977;Brody & Mendlinger, 1980;Bahrman eta!., 1988;Vakhitov & Gimalov, 1988;Yen & Kiniber, 1990).…”