2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11105-021-01290-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Diversity and Population Assessment of Musa L. (Musaceae) Employing CDDP Markers

Abstract: Sixty-six accessions of Musa genus with different genomic groups that consisted of wild relatives and cultivated lines were obtained from the International Transit Center, Belgium, for DNA extraction using Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide method, followed by amplification with Conserved DNA-derived Polymorphism (CDDP) markers for genetic diversity and population assessment. A total of 421 alleles with major allele frequency of 2.051 were detected from the reproducible markers. High genetic diversity (GD, 11.093… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, using SCoT marker to characterize genetic diversity in sesame germplasm has not yet been described in other molecular investigations in Sesamum indicum L except in the report of Maini and Dasgupta (Bhattacharjee and Dasgupta, 2020). ISSR and SCoT markers have been proven valuable in genetic diversity investigations because of their high reproducibility and great ability to detect polymorphism (Thakur et al, 2021a;Igwe et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, using SCoT marker to characterize genetic diversity in sesame germplasm has not yet been described in other molecular investigations in Sesamum indicum L except in the report of Maini and Dasgupta (Bhattacharjee and Dasgupta, 2020). ISSR and SCoT markers have been proven valuable in genetic diversity investigations because of their high reproducibility and great ability to detect polymorphism (Thakur et al, 2021a;Igwe et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both countries are partly covered by the (sub)tropical forests of northern Indo-Burma, which harbour many wild Musa populations (Janssens et al 2016 ; Mertens et al 2021b ). While these accessions have been used multiple times in previous studies as representatives of the wild diploid “BB” genomic group, their wild origin remains uncertain due to the lack of passport data (Ruas et al 2017 ; Christelová et al 2017 ; Zuo et al 2018 ; Nakato et al 2019 ; Igwe et al 2021 ). The five remaining ITC accessionswere of Philippine originand showed relatively high genetic variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a previous study, Musa (ABB) showed low variation when the genetic relationship was assessed using SSR [ 2 ]. SRAP markers are recommended as a more efficient means of distinguishing between Musa schizocarpa , M. balbisiana , and M. acuminata in the Eumusa section and between plantains and cooking bananas among triploid cultivars [ 26 ]. Previous research using ISSR and SCoT markers to investigate the genetic diversity of Musa species with different genomes showed that ISSR markers produced lower levels of genetic polymorphism [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%