2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-018-0682-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and population structure analyses of Plectranthus edulis (Vatke) Agnew collections from diverse agro-ecologies in Ethiopia using newly developed EST-SSRs marker system

Abstract: BackgroundPlectranthus edulis (Vatke) Agnew (locally known as Ethiopian dinich or Ethiopian potato) is one of the most economically important edible tuber crops indigenous to Ethiopia. Evaluating the extent of genetic diversity within and among populations is one of the first and most important steps in breeding and conservation measures. Hence, this study was aimed at evaluating the genetic diversity and population structure of this crop using collections from diverse agro-ecologies in Ethiopia.ResultsTwenty … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(59 reference statements)
3
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the frequent migration indicated by the relatively high gene flow was opposite to the fragmented distributions of the investigated populations, for which, the putative explanation may be that of frequent human actions, primarily due to overexploitation and illegal logging [12]. Similar observations were also found for Acer miaotaiense (P. C. Tsoong) [34] and Plectranthus edulis (Vatke) Agnew [47]. Additionally, a genetic drift could not be ignored, since the population sizes are so small that any reduction in size could result in genetic drift.…”
Section: Genetic Differentiation and Population Structurementioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the frequent migration indicated by the relatively high gene flow was opposite to the fragmented distributions of the investigated populations, for which, the putative explanation may be that of frequent human actions, primarily due to overexploitation and illegal logging [12]. Similar observations were also found for Acer miaotaiense (P. C. Tsoong) [34] and Plectranthus edulis (Vatke) Agnew [47]. Additionally, a genetic drift could not be ignored, since the population sizes are so small that any reduction in size could result in genetic drift.…”
Section: Genetic Differentiation and Population Structurementioning
confidence: 53%
“…Genetic diversity in wild plant species is often related to the geographic range, population size, longevity, mating system, migration, and balancing selection [34,45,46]. Higher genetic diversity is expected to reflect a better adaption to the environments of a species [47]. However, the medium genetic diversity level of D. odorifera was indicated by the observed and expected heterozygosity of 0.28 and 0.37, respectively.…”
Section: Genetic Diversity Of D Odoriferamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar in silico approaches in EST-SSR marker development were performed by other studies focusing on other plants, such as bamboo (Cai et al, 2019), mint (Kumar et al, 2015), castor (Thatikunta et al, 2016), Ethiopian potato (Gadissa et al, 2018) and Elymus species (Zhang et al, 2019). The EST-derived SSR markers generated in this study can be used for functional analysis of R genes, once verified by wet lab experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Over the past years, SSRs were successfully developed in different ornamental plants via data mining, such as Magnolia ashei [19], Lagerstroemia indica [20], Paeonia suffruticosa [21], and Rosa hybrida [22]. In addition, SSRs have also been widely used in plant genetics and breeding for genetic diversity analysis [23], cultivar identi cation [24], DNA ngerprinting [25], linkage mapping [26], and association mapping [27]. So far, only 14 pairs of polymorphic SSR markers have been developed for S. vulgaris [28] and S. josikaea [29], through conventional methods, however, it is greatly limited due to a prevalent lack of genomic and transcriptomic information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%