2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-006-0498-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity and spatial genetic structure of Pinus strobus (Pinaceae) across an island landscape inferred from allozyme and cpDNA markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the first report of chloroplast microsatellite genetic diversity across the range in eastern white pine. The haplotype diversity observed in our study is lower than that reported for four eastern white pine populations sampled from the Beaver Island Archipelago in Michigan (H = 0.80) [ 52 ]. The differences are likely due to the differences in the sample size and the number of cpSSRs used between the two studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the first report of chloroplast microsatellite genetic diversity across the range in eastern white pine. The haplotype diversity observed in our study is lower than that reported for four eastern white pine populations sampled from the Beaver Island Archipelago in Michigan (H = 0.80) [ 52 ]. The differences are likely due to the differences in the sample size and the number of cpSSRs used between the two studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with the lower mutation rate in chloroplast than nuclear microsatellites in Pinus [ 50 ] and other plants. Chloroplast microsatellites (cpSSR) have been previously used to test the somatic stability of the cloned material [ 51 ] and spatial genetic structure [ 52 ] in eastern white pine. This is the first report of chloroplast microsatellite genetic diversity across the range in eastern white pine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, relevant studies have focused on the species’ native distribution range and have dealt with population genetic structure [100][105] or spatial genetic structure [47], [68], [69], [106], [107]. The main findings of the present study are:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…A possible explanation for this phenomenon is that the cpDNA genome behaves as a single locus and the spatial autocorrelation of chloroplast haplotypes is subject to higher stochasticity than the multi-locus nSSRs. Thus, drift may have a stronger effect on the pattern of genetic differentiation of the chloroplast haplotypes than on that measured by nuclear markers (Myers et al 2007). Nevertheless, we cannot completely rule out that partly low sample sizes contributed to the overall variance in values of genetic differentiation.…”
Section: Population Genetic Comparison Of Nssr and Cpssr Markersmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, chloroplastic loci are prone to higher stochasticity and have higher susceptibility to genetic drift than nuclear loci (Birky et al 1989;Petit et al 1993;Ennos 1994;Ennos 1997, 1999;Ribeiro et al 2002). Consequently, population genetic differentiation is expected to be higher for chloroplast loci than for nuclear genes, and their spatial autocorrelation will be a better indicator for genetic drift (Myers et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%