2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00606-011-0464-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity of Cypripedium calceolus in Poland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The similarity of the two Biebrza populations suggests their common origin and ongoing gene exchange. Other orchids investigated in northeast Poland present a similar situation (Brzosko, Wróblewska & Tałałaj, 2004; Brzosko et al ., 2009, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The similarity of the two Biebrza populations suggests their common origin and ongoing gene exchange. Other orchids investigated in northeast Poland present a similar situation (Brzosko, Wróblewska & Tałałaj, 2004; Brzosko et al ., 2009, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The influence of mating between relatives on the genetic variation of N. ovata populations is strictly connected with their small size, especially in the context of effective population size (Whitlock, 2000). Many empirical studies have shown that smaller populations have lower genetic variation (Young, Boyle & Brown, 1996;Frankham, Ballou & Briscoe, 2003;Brzosko et al, 2011), and the main factor behind this is genetic drift. Small population size is a common characteristic of the populations studied and, presumably, it was an important factor in their decreased levels of genetic and genotypic variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragmentation among its populations at varying level of severity was observed in some countries but this process was not regarded as a major threat to the species (Rankou and Bilz 2014), mainly due to its wide distribution. Results of previous genetic studies on C. calceolus showed relatively high levels of polymorphism and clonal diversity as well as low or moderate levels of population differentiation (Kull and Paaver 1997;Brzosko et al 2002Brzosko et al , 2009Brzosko et al , 2011Gargiulo et al 2018), which may support the claim that fragmentation has little effect on C. calceolus. However, authors attributed these features to persistence of residual diversity when the species had a more continuous distribution and pointed out that observed population differentiation may also be fragmentation related (Kull and Paaver 1997;Brzosko et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In different regions of Eurasia, C. calceolus has been estimated as Near Threatened (Bilz 2011, Turis et al 2014, Vulnerable (Rassi et al 2001), Endangered (Witkowski et al 2003), and Critically Endangered (Blinova & Uotila 2011, Khapugin et al 2017a, Khapugin et al 2017c. International studies on C. calceolus related to its genetic diversity (Brzosko et al 2009, Brzosko et al 2011, Fay et al 2009, Kļaviņa et al 2014, Minasiewicz & Znaniecka 2014, population ecology and biology (Blinova 2002, Brzosko 2002, Davison et al 2013, Fardeeva et al 2010, Gajewski & Marcisz 2014, Khapugin et al 2014, Korczyński & Krasicka-Korczyńska 2014, García et al 2002, García et al 2010, Gorchakovskii & Igosheva 2003, Kirillova 2015, Kull 1998, Nicolè et al 2005, Puchnina 2017, Stetsuk 2013, Zheleznaya 2015, impacts of environment conditions and stress-factors on the species (Blinova 2002, Czerepko et al 2014, Kirillova 2016, Kirillova et al 2012, Puchnina 2017, Shefferson et al 2012, pollination (Antonelli et al 2009, Tremblay 1994, as well as the list of publications with new records of this threatened species is continuously enlarging ...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%