Forest Diversity and Management 2006
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5208-8_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic diversity of Dalbergia monticola (Fabaceae) an endangered tree species in the fragmented oriental forest of Madagascar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the other half of the total variation has shown variable patterns with three markers used. Andrianoelina et al (2006) analyzed the genetic variation and related parameters for D. monticola, another woody legume and have found similar results as more than 80 % variation was present within the individuals of the populations. Likewise, the extent of genetic variation present among populations within the groups (16 %) was nearly one-third of that present among populations (36 %) (Pither et al 2003;Awasthi et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Interestingly, the other half of the total variation has shown variable patterns with three markers used. Andrianoelina et al (2006) analyzed the genetic variation and related parameters for D. monticola, another woody legume and have found similar results as more than 80 % variation was present within the individuals of the populations. Likewise, the extent of genetic variation present among populations within the groups (16 %) was nearly one-third of that present among populations (36 %) (Pither et al 2003;Awasthi et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Genetic distance (below diagonal) and geographic distance (above diagonal) between populations of Dalbergia sissoo. sity are 51%, 0.223 and 0.15, respectively (Andrianoelina et al, 2006). In D. odorifera, PPB, Shannon diversity index and Nei's genetic diversity are 54.55%, 0.3137 and 0.2137, respectively, at the species level, and at the population level, the average PPB, Shannon diversity index and Nei's genetic diversity are 40.9%, 0.2048 and 0.1353, respectively (Yang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because RAPD markers are sometimes criticized for their low reproducibility, AFLPs have become the preferred markers in many studies because of higher reliability and precision. However, RAPDs have been applied satisfactorily both to assess genetic variability of endemic and/or relict species (e.g., Pye and Gadek, 2004; Renau‐Morata et al, 2005; Andrianoelina et al, 2006; Romeiras et al, 2007) and to ascertain the Pleistocene population dynamics of some Pyrenean, arctic, and alpine plants (Gabrielsen et al, 1997; Bauert et al, 1998; Tollefsrud et al, 1998; Segarra‐Moragues and Catalán, 2003). Moreover, Kjølner et al (2004) addressed the congruence of the results obtained with RAPDs and AFLPs, concluding that RAPDs might be used as reliable method in small, low‐tech laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%