2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2018.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic evidence of promiscuity in a mammal without apparent sexual dimorphism, the white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Devido a sua estrutura social, os machos dominantes nos grupos de queixadas mantidos em cativeiro têm acesso prioritário a recursos limitados, como alimentos e fêmeas em estro [4]. Em vida livre, contudo, as fêmeas de queixadas apresentam comportamento promíscuo [11]. Por sua vez, para caititus não se observou mais de 1 macho copulando com uma mesma fêmea receptiva [4].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Devido a sua estrutura social, os machos dominantes nos grupos de queixadas mantidos em cativeiro têm acesso prioritário a recursos limitados, como alimentos e fêmeas em estro [4]. Em vida livre, contudo, as fêmeas de queixadas apresentam comportamento promíscuo [11]. Por sua vez, para caititus não se observou mais de 1 macho copulando com uma mesma fêmea receptiva [4].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Social mating systems (e.g., monogamy, polygyny, and polyandry) are relatively stable behavioral strategies for mating relationships in animals (Orians 1969; Emlen and Oring 1977;Zhang 1995Zhang , 2000Young et al 2011). Mating systems tend to be species-level traits, although alternative mating strategies can be expressed by individuals within a species (Morris et al 2010;Blanch eld et al 2003; Katharina et al2018;Dalila et al 2018). Interestingly, research has shown that there can be dramatic differences between social mating systems and their predicted underlying genetic signatures, as has been demonstrated in avian species (Breed and Moore 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to highlight that not all polygynous ungulate species exhibit SSD, including for example, equids [ 14 ] and peccaries [ 15 ], while molecular analysis has begun to reveal that the largest and strongest males do not always outcompete smaller rivals and monopolize access to oestrus females [ 16 ]. In fact, when paternity is accounted for, the relationship between sexual dimorphism and polygyny is often less pronounced than originally predicted [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%