2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02411-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic factors for survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an integrated approach combining a systematic review, pairwise and network meta-analysis

Abstract: Background The time of survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) varies greatly, and the genetic factors that contribute to the survival of ALS are not well studied. There is a lack of a comprehensive study to elucidate the role of genetic factors in the survival of ALS. Methods The published studies were systematically searched and obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library without any language restrictions from inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common familial ALS cases include mutation of the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72, present in 7.7% of ALS cases), followed by Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1, 2.0%), never in mitosis A (NIMA)related kinase 1 (NEK1, 1.8%), TAR DNA binding protein (TARDBP) (1.4%), and kinesin family member 5A ( KIF5A, 0.8%) [11]. For risk factor and prognostic variants, compared to the above gene mutations, ataxin-2 gene (ATXN2) intermediate trinucleotide expansion in 3.9% of ALS subjects and increased ALS risk [11,16,17]. In spite of the fact that the disease was first described almost 200 years ago [18] and the simultaneous involvement of both the UMN and LMN has been identified as the disease's distinctive hallmark, the diagnosis of ALS is still mostly a clinical one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common familial ALS cases include mutation of the chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72, present in 7.7% of ALS cases), followed by Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1, 2.0%), never in mitosis A (NIMA)related kinase 1 (NEK1, 1.8%), TAR DNA binding protein (TARDBP) (1.4%), and kinesin family member 5A ( KIF5A, 0.8%) [11]. For risk factor and prognostic variants, compared to the above gene mutations, ataxin-2 gene (ATXN2) intermediate trinucleotide expansion in 3.9% of ALS subjects and increased ALS risk [11,16,17]. In spite of the fact that the disease was first described almost 200 years ago [18] and the simultaneous involvement of both the UMN and LMN has been identified as the disease's distinctive hallmark, the diagnosis of ALS is still mostly a clinical one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, this association was only nominally significant, which — in addition to the absence of further oligogenic associations with ALS age of onset — results in a lack of clarity regarding the validity of this relationship. We only observed an association between singleton carriers and survival period when the C9orf72 repeat expansion was included in the analysis, which may be explained by the C9orf72 pathogenic repeat expansion being associated with a decreased survival period individually 43,44 . Overall, consistent with recent reports 11,45,46 , these results suggest the genetic architecture underlying ALS risk is decoupled from that underlying survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The heterogeneity of ALS means, despite all the best stratification strategies, the risk of having groups that are not perfectly comparable. This challenges trialists to categorize patients in homogeneous subgroups based on phenotype characteristics, such as age, clinical type, comorbidities, respiratory function, stage of disease progression, disease management [8], and even genotype [17], all possible predictors of disease course also related to aging [18][19][20]. Furthermore, the stage of neurodegeneration is not the same in all neurons, and different biological manifestations might be active in different regional groups of motor neurons.…”
Section: Disease Heterogeneity and Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%