2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2002.0831a.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic identity of two Indian pig types using microsatellite markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PIC value can range from 0 to 1, however, range of PIC estimates in this study were ranging from 0.41(Sw2008) to 0.86 (S0218) for Niang Megha whereas from 0.45 (S0026) to 0.88 (S0005) in Tenyi Vo with mean of 0.65 ±0.03 and 0.68± 0.0.03, respectively. Similar results were also reported in other pigs (Laval et al, 2000;Martinez et al, 2000;Behl et al, 2002;Li et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2004). Most of the markers had PIC values higher than 0.5, which is a useful indicator of genetic variability and forms the basis for developing breeding or genetic improvement strategy for a population.…”
Section: Polymorphic Information Content (Pic)supporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PIC value can range from 0 to 1, however, range of PIC estimates in this study were ranging from 0.41(Sw2008) to 0.86 (S0218) for Niang Megha whereas from 0.45 (S0026) to 0.88 (S0005) in Tenyi Vo with mean of 0.65 ±0.03 and 0.68± 0.0.03, respectively. Similar results were also reported in other pigs (Laval et al, 2000;Martinez et al, 2000;Behl et al, 2002;Li et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2004). Most of the markers had PIC values higher than 0.5, which is a useful indicator of genetic variability and forms the basis for developing breeding or genetic improvement strategy for a population.…”
Section: Polymorphic Information Content (Pic)supporting
confidence: 75%
“…The genetic diversity of LWY pigs or other European pig breeds were also reported in various other studies (Fredholm et al, 1993;van Zeveran et al, 1995;Laval et al, 2000;Martinez et al, 2000). However, the high genetic diversity have been reported earlier in Desi and Gahuri pigs by us (Behl et al, 2002 andBehl et al, 2006) and also in Chinese and Mexican pig populations (Lemus Flores et al, 2001;Fang et al, 2005). A total of 23 and 22 private alleles were observed for Niang Megha and Tenyi Vo pigs, respectively.…”
Section: Genetic Variability Of Microsatellite Locimentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The mean expected genetic heterozygosity was 0.454 for Auckland Island pigs, which was not only lower than the heterozygosities of commercial pig breeds that have experienced intensive selection, but was also lower than for most minor indigenous breeds in Europe, Asia, and Middle America (Laval et al 2000;Li et al 2000;Martinez et al 2000;Behl et al 2002;Fan et al 2002;Yang et al 2003). Clearly AKLD pigs are genetically depauperate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fr/lgc/pig/panel.htm). The usefulness of the above markers for analysis of genetic diversity and structure of European, Chinese, Iberian, Indian, and Mexican domestic and indigenous pig breeds has been demonstrated by previous studies (Laval et al 2000;Li et al 2000;Martinez et al 2000;Lemus-Flores et al 2001;Behl et al 2002;Fan et al 2002;Yang et al 2003). These accumulated studies have provided an opportunity to explore the phylogenetic relationships of pig breeds and populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This can be compared to microsatellite allele numbers of 2.40 in Turopolje pig breed (Harcet et al, in press). Other studies of pig diversity show microsatellite allele numbers to be in the range from 3.220 to 5.840 in European breeds (Martinez et al, 2000;Laval et al, 2000), 4.351 to 6.108, in Chinese breeds (Fan et al, 2003;Li et al, 2000), 7.00 to 7.74 in Indian breeds (Behl et al, 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%