The Genetics of the Pig 2011
DOI: 10.1079/9781845937560.0390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic improvement of the pig.

Abstract: The principles and the organization of current genetic improvement programmes, breeding objectives, selection criteria, economic and non-economic traits, breeding value, the design of breeding programmes, genetic gain and the usefulness of genetic markers and genomic selection in pig breeding are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another scenario to reduce routine costs of genomic selection is the genotyping with a SNP panel of reduced density, to impute missing SNP genotypes from a HD panel (Habier et al 2009;Dekkers et al 2011). Imputation techniques were recently reviewed by Calus et al (2014) by giving a complete overview of features and techniques associated to this strategy.…”
Section: Economic Aspects Of Genomic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another scenario to reduce routine costs of genomic selection is the genotyping with a SNP panel of reduced density, to impute missing SNP genotypes from a HD panel (Habier et al 2009;Dekkers et al 2011). Imputation techniques were recently reviewed by Calus et al (2014) by giving a complete overview of features and techniques associated to this strategy.…”
Section: Economic Aspects Of Genomic Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this strategy could be difficult to implement in practical breeding situations for the short time span between birth and the beginning of the sib test. Because timing is essential to keep short generation intervals in pig selection programs (Dekkers et al, 2011;Tribout et al, 2011), this issue was not further investigated. In that perspective, the possible co-selection of multiple sibs as selection candidates would not be practical, also for the problems derived by an increased level of inbreeding (Lillehammer et al, 2011).…”
Section: Single-step (Sstep) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the implementation of a successful genomic selection program should balance the advantages derived from the enlargement of the training population and the extra costs involved in genotyping to assure the maximum benefit associated with selection (Akanno et al, 2014). A potential perspective could include the reorganization of the current swine breeding programs to exploit benefits associated with genomic selection (Dekkers et al, 2011;Akanno et al, 2014).…”
Section: Single-step (Sstep) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This includes traits of interest, relative significance of each trait and the direction of improvement. The traits included in the breeding goal depend upon the expected market requirements of the end product (Dekkers et al, 2011). In pig breeding, this means consumer expectations when the pork from genetically improved breeding stock will be sold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%