2015
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic influences on dental enamel that impact caries differ between the primary and permanent dentitions

Abstract: Clinically, primary and permanent teeth are distinct anatomically and the presentation of caries lesions differs between the two dentitions. However, the possibility exists that genetic contributions to tooth formation of the two dentitions are different. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that genetic associations with an artificial caries model will not be the same between primary and permanent dentitions. Enamel samples from primary and permanent teeth were tested for microhardness at base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some also appear to be dentition specific, which likely reflects the known anatomical/structural differences between both dentitions (Bayram et al 2015).…”
Section: Inherited and Acquired Risk Factors For Dental Caries And Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some also appear to be dentition specific, which likely reflects the known anatomical/structural differences between both dentitions (Bayram et al 2015).…”
Section: Inherited and Acquired Risk Factors For Dental Caries And Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of our previous studies investigated the association between these genes and caries susceptibility and enamel alteration [Deeley et al, 2008; Tannure et al, 2012; Shimizu et al, 2012; Jeremias et al, 2013; Abbasoğlu et al, 2015; Bayram et al, 2015]. TUFT1 and TUIP11 were associated with variations in enamel microhardness [Shimizu et al, 2012].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ENAM were associated with enamel hypoplasia [Jeremias et al, 2013]. AMELX, TFIP11, ENAM, TUFT1, KLK4, AMBN and MMP20 also observed an association between some of these genes with caries susceptibility in primary and permanent dentition [Deeley et al, 2008; Tannure et al, 2012; Shimizu et al, 2012 Jeremias et al, 2013; Abbasoğlu et al, 2015; Bayram et al, 2015]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study benefited from a large sample size and by investigating caries in both primary and permanent dentitions, which previous work has suggested differ in their genetic risk 3, 36 . We, too, found different results between dentitions, although this could be explained by differences in power.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic association was tested using linear regression under the additive genetic model while simultaneously adjusting for age, sex, and two principal components of ancestry (generated across all cohorts using principal components analysis of 2,663 SNPs in 71 genes of interest as well as 96 ancestry-informative SNPs specifically chosen for modeling ancestry). Analyses were performed separately in 13 age- (i.e., child vs. adult) and race-stratified samples; this decision was based on hypothesized differences in the genes underlying caries susceptibility in the primary and permanent dentitions 3, 36 as well as to guard against spurious results due to population structure. Stouffer's inverse-variance weighted method was used to combine p-values across stratified analyses in order to determine statistical significance of associations across samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%