1988
DOI: 10.1139/g88-031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic interactions among four genes for resistance to stem rust in bread wheat

Abstract: 1988. Genetic interactions among four genes for resistance to stem rust in bread wheat. Genome, 30: 182 -185. Near-isogenic lines of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) carrying the genes Sr7a, Sr8a, Sr9b, and S r l l for stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici Eriks. and Henn.) resistance had been developed previously using nine backcrosses to the cultivar Marquis. The lines were intercrossed to produce the six possible two-gene combinations and three of the four possible three-gene combinations. The objec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knott & Weller (1988) detected enhanced resistance in combinations of wheat stem rust resistance genes in the seedling stage only to rust isolates avirulent to the individual stem rust resistance genes . Samborski & Dyck (1982) (Dyck & Johnson, 1983) .…”
Section: Wheat Linementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Knott & Weller (1988) detected enhanced resistance in combinations of wheat stem rust resistance genes in the seedling stage only to rust isolates avirulent to the individual stem rust resistance genes . Samborski & Dyck (1982) (Dyck & Johnson, 1983) .…”
Section: Wheat Linementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies have shown additive interactions between Rph20 and other APR genes, such as Rph23 and Rph24 (Singh et al 2015;Ziems et al 2017). In wheat, the gene combination Sr2+Sr9d was shown to provide additive resistance, with the level of resistance detected exceeding the genes individually because Sr2 has a modifying effect on Sr9d (Knott and Weller 1988). Interestingly, an enhancement in resistance was also observed by Samborski and Dyck (1982) even when two ineffective genes were combined due to a ghost effect of one gene on another.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Interactions can occur between resistance genes when combined, resulting in a lowering of the disease level relative to that conferred by individual genes (Dyck 1977;Samborski and Dyck 1982). Rust resistance genes can interact in different ways, for example: (i) additive effects -when two effective genes are combined, a level of resistance higher than that of the individual genes alone is seen (Knott and Weller 1988;Singh et al 2015;Ziems et al 2017); (ii) modifying effect -when an effective gene is combined with an ineffective gene, the latter may lead to an improved level of resistance (Knott and Weller 1988); and (iii) residual or ghost effect -when two ineffective genes are combined, an increase in resistance may be observed due to small residual effects of the genes (Knott and Weller 1988). The focus on interactions between individual genes arose after the gene-forgene relationship in host-parasite interactions was proposed by Flor (1942).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%