2011
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2010.00142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Manipulation of Francisella Tularensis

Abstract: Francisella tularensis is a facultative intracellular pathogen that causes the disease tularemia. F. tularensis subsp. tularensis causes the most severe disease in humans and has been classified as a Category A select agent and potential bioweapon. There is currently no vaccine approved for human use, making genetic manipulation of this organism critical to unraveling the genetic basis of pathogenesis and developing countermeasures against tularemia. The development of genetic techniques applicable to F. tular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the defined iglD mutation prevents intracellular replication in permissive host cells and virulence in permissive animal models, resulting in a highly attenuated and inherently safer strain. Finally, Fn is more amenable to genetic manipulations than Ftt or Fth [34] , which facilitates the further development of this vaccine platform to enhance efficacy and provide protection against heterologous antigens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the defined iglD mutation prevents intracellular replication in permissive host cells and virulence in permissive animal models, resulting in a highly attenuated and inherently safer strain. Finally, Fn is more amenable to genetic manipulations than Ftt or Fth [34] , which facilitates the further development of this vaccine platform to enhance efficacy and provide protection against heterologous antigens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same applies for molecular microbiology and genetic manipulation techniques, such as the development of random insertional mutants for B. pseudomallei , 12 the allelic exchange in F. tularensis , 13 and the genome-wide screens for B. anthracis 14 . Finally, the reproducibility and regulatory compliance for relevant animal models is debatable, as it is reflected from comparative studies in F. tularensis and Burkholderia sp 15 .…”
Section: Key Bacterial Biological Warfare Agents (Bwas)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the efforts in recent years, complementation from plasmid remains difficult in Francisella . Non-native expression levels (Santic et al, 2007 ; Zogaj and Klose, 2010 ) and spontaneous deletions in pFNL200 (Pomerantsev et al, 2001b ) and pFNLTP (Maier et al, 2004 ) were reported. Another problem is the relatively low electroporation efficiency in Francisella and especially in F. novicida for plasmids isolated from E. coli .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%