2019
DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27845v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic map construction and functional characterization of genes within the segregation distortion regions (SDRs) in the F2:3 generation derived from wild cotton species of the D genome

Abstract: Segregation distortion (SD) is a phenomenon common among stable or segregating populations, and the principle behind it is still an issue that puzzles many researchers. An F2:3 generations developed from the wild cotton species of the D genomes was applied to investigate the possible plant transcription factors within the segregation distortion regions (SDRs). We constructed a consensus map between two maps in the D genome, map A; Gossypium klotzschianum and Gossypium davidsonii and Map B; Gossypium thurberi a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…that a higher number of SDRs were situated on chromosomes 02, 16 and 18 [60]. Similarly, Kirungu et al [16] observed the highest segregation distorted markers on chromosomes 02 and 07 in the genetic map of two wild cotton species., Chromosome 02 had the least mapped markers but had the highest percentage of segregation distortion, ranging between 42.8% and 76.08% [16]. Entire loci in SDR3-17 (Chr.17) and SDR20-23 (Chr23) diverged to G. darwinii, while 90% of the loci in four SDRs on D4 (Chr.22) and SDR21-23 (Chr23) deviated towards the female parent G. hirsutum CCRI12.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…that a higher number of SDRs were situated on chromosomes 02, 16 and 18 [60]. Similarly, Kirungu et al [16] observed the highest segregation distorted markers on chromosomes 02 and 07 in the genetic map of two wild cotton species., Chromosome 02 had the least mapped markers but had the highest percentage of segregation distortion, ranging between 42.8% and 76.08% [16]. Entire loci in SDR3-17 (Chr.17) and SDR20-23 (Chr23) diverged to G. darwinii, while 90% of the loci in four SDRs on D4 (Chr.22) and SDR21-23 (Chr23) deviated towards the female parent G. hirsutum CCRI12.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 74%
“…Previously, these methods have been employed by Ditta et al [31]. Meanwhile, the identified candidate genes from SSR markers found within SDRs had already been used by Kirungu et al [16]. The protein kinase, zinc finger and MYB domain of each gene were confirmed from SMART and PFAM databases (http://smart.emblheidelberg.de/; http://pfam.xfam.org).…”
Section: Identification Of Genes From Ssr Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although it has been described that the use of distorted markers could increase the genome coverage of the genetic maps (Zhang et al, 2007 , 2013 ; Cai et al, 2015 ) and it may be beneficial for QTL mapping (Xu, 2008 ; Zhang et al, 2010 ), many authors eliminate the skewed markers and they are not used for linkage maps construction, diminishing the information that it is possible to obtain. It has been proposed that the study of segregation distortion is significant because distorted markers may be linked to genes or traits of interest, and these genes may be beneficial or lethal to organisms (Kirungu et al, 2019 ). Then, the exclusion of such markers could bias the data and result in the loss of some important genetic information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%