2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-019-0494-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameters for body weight and different definitions of residual feed intake in broiler chickens

Abstract: Background The objectives of this study were to (1) simultaneously estimate genetic parameters for BW, feed intake (FI), and body weight gain (Gain) during a FI test in broiler chickens using multi-trait Bayesian analysis; (2) derive phenotypic and genetic residual feed intake (RFI) and estimate genetic parameters of the resulting traits; and (3) compute a Bayesian measure of direct and correlated superiority of a group selected on phenotypic or genetic residual feed intake. A total of 56,649 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is the easiest and most common measure of RFI used in pigs and other species (e.g. cattle, sheep, chicken and even fish [ 39 42 ]), although some authors recommend to compute RFI from the genetic covariance matrix, such as Mebratie et al[ 8 ]. Our results obtained with the multi-SAD and the phenotypic regression models were different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it is the easiest and most common measure of RFI used in pigs and other species (e.g. cattle, sheep, chicken and even fish [ 39 42 ]), although some authors recommend to compute RFI from the genetic covariance matrix, such as Mebratie et al[ 8 ]. Our results obtained with the multi-SAD and the phenotypic regression models were different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if genetic regression is used to derive RFI, it is then independent of the other traits at the genetic level (but not at the phenotypic level) [ 5 ]. The use of different regression coefficients for the genetic and environmental parts of the component traits (feed intake, production, body weight/composition traits), in a multiple trait approach, accounts for the multiple origins of the phenotypic correlations [ 8 , 9 ] and provides a RFI that is independent of the other traits at the genetic level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feed efficiency is generally estimated using residual feed intake (RFI), which was proposed in 1963 and is considered the most functional parameter for the evaluation of feed efficiency ( Koch et al, 1963 ). At present, RFI has been applied in the artificial selection of feed efficiency in mammals and poultry ( Mebratie et al, 2019 ; Banerjee et al, 2020 ; Liu and VandeHaar, 2020 ). There is a general agreement that RFI is a moderately inherited characteristic, making it easy to improve the feed efficiency of commercial breeding companies ( Sell-Kubiak et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method presented here has been applied for the estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of response to selection for linear or ratio expressions of feed efficiency in pigs by Shirali et al (2018) . Mebratie et al (2019) used this approach for the simultaneous estimation of genetic parameters for production and feed efficiency traits for male and female broiler chickens using a multi-trait Bayesian analysis. In dairy cattle, Islam et al (2020) used a Bayesian multivariate random regression to analyze dry matter intake, energy-corrected milk, body weight, and body condition score and derived a genetic RFI from it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This avoids the analysis of derived traits as well as the use of a two-step procedure for computing RFI so that more consistent inference can be made. The method was previously applied for the estimation of genetic parameters for feed efficiency in pigs ( Shirali et al, 2018 ), broiler chickens ( Mebratie et al, 2019 ), and dairy cattle ( Islam et al, 2020 ). Here, we illustrate the method with more theoretical background and apply it on data on growing beef bulls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%