2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3835(01)00398-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, glutathione S-transferase (GST) M1 and GSTT1 and susceptibility to prostate cancer in the Japanese population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
4
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
74
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the genotype of each gene was not significantly related to this end-point (data not shown), possibly because the number of patients in this study was too small to elicit statistically significant results regarding the frequency of patients whose seminal findings increased into the WHO reference range. However, it is still important to note that varicocelectomy improves motile sperm concentrations, because this factor influences patients' decisions regarding assisted reproductive techniques [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][38][39][40][41]. In our series, the GSTM1-null, GSTT1-null, SOD2-Val/Val and NQO1-Ser/Ser genotypes were found in 52.7%, 49.8%, 83.2% and 17.8% of the controls, respectively, which are consistent with those observed earlier in Asian populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the genotype of each gene was not significantly related to this end-point (data not shown), possibly because the number of patients in this study was too small to elicit statistically significant results regarding the frequency of patients whose seminal findings increased into the WHO reference range. However, it is still important to note that varicocelectomy improves motile sperm concentrations, because this factor influences patients' decisions regarding assisted reproductive techniques [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][38][39][40][41]. In our series, the GSTM1-null, GSTT1-null, SOD2-Val/Val and NQO1-Ser/Ser genotypes were found in 52.7%, 49.8%, 83.2% and 17.8% of the controls, respectively, which are consistent with those observed earlier in Asian populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These polymorphisms of GSTs, SOD2 and NQO1 have been reported to influence individual susceptibility to various diseases, including malignancy [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], although the relationship between polymorphisms and male infertility remains to be elucidated [26,27]. We therefore speculated that individual susceptibility to varicocele-induced ROS may depend on one or more of these genetic polymorphisms and that the outcome of varicocelectomy may be influenced by an individual's genetic susceptibility to ROS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A la fecha en la literatura publicada no hemos encontrado diseños del tipo case-only para estos genotipos y su relación con cáncer de próstata. Murata y cols, en estudios (caso-control) realizados en población japonesa informaron de incrementos en el riesgo de CaP (OR 2,3 CI 95% 1,18-4,48; OR 2,2 CI 95% 1,12-4,20) cuando ambos polimorfismos genéticos estuvieron presentes (GSTM1 nulo y CYP1A1 m2) 39,40 . Por otro lado, diversos autores han evaluado polimorfismos genéticos combinados de GSTM1, GSTT1 y riesgo de CaP.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…En cambio, los mismos autores no encontraron relación entre GSTM1 susceptible genotipo, hábito de fumar y riesgo de CaP. Similares hallazgos comunican Murata y cols 40 , quienes no observaron ningún efecto modificador en CaP cuando el hábito de fumar fue considerado. En general no existe clara evidencia epidemiológica que apoye una relación causal entre el hábito de fumar y riesgo de CaP 2,42,43 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Of these studies, 9 reported on Caucasians, and 9 reported on East Asians. Studies were carried out in Japan (Murata et al, 2001;Nakazato et al, 2003;Komiya et al, 2005), China (Guan et al, 2005;Lai et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2006;Li et al, 2008), India ( Vijayalakshmi et al, 2005;Srivastava et al, 2005;Mittal et al, 2006;Thakur et al, 2011;Kumar et al, 2011), South Korea (Kwon et al, 2011), Iran (Ashtiani et al, 2011;Safarinejad et al, 2011) and Turkey (Aktas et al, 2004;Silig et al, 2006). A list of details abstracted from the studies included in the meta-analysis is provided through Table 1.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%