2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.09.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic programming based quantitative structure–retention relationships for the prediction of Kovats retention indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these techniques were neither sufficient nor comprehensive enough to clearly show the interactions of parameters and crop yield and could not capture the highly nonlinear and complex relationships between OC and other traits (Khairunniza‐Bejo, Mustaffha, & Ismail, ; Singh, Kanchan, Verma, & Singh, ). These complex relationships need nonlinear methods such as artificial neural networks (ANN), genetic expression programming (GEP), adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), or Bayesian classification (BC) to overcome the drawbacks of linear methods (Goel, Bapat, Vyas, Tambe, & Tambe, ; Iquebal et al, ; Khoshnevisan, Rafiee, & Mousazadeh, ; Samadianfard, Nazemi, & Ashraf Sadraddini, ; Silva et al, ; Zeng, Xu, Wu, & Huang, ). In the last few decades, ANN have been widely used to predict SY in different crops like soybean, corn (Kaul, Hill, & Walthall, ), rice (Ji, Sun, Yang, & Wan, ), wheat (Alvarez, ), barley (Gholipour, Rohani, & Torani, ), sunflower (Zeng et al, ), and sesame (Emamgholizadeh, Parsaeian, & Baradaran, ) as well as genomic selection (Yong‐Jun, Lei, Wang, & Chang‐Hong, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques were neither sufficient nor comprehensive enough to clearly show the interactions of parameters and crop yield and could not capture the highly nonlinear and complex relationships between OC and other traits (Khairunniza‐Bejo, Mustaffha, & Ismail, ; Singh, Kanchan, Verma, & Singh, ). These complex relationships need nonlinear methods such as artificial neural networks (ANN), genetic expression programming (GEP), adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), or Bayesian classification (BC) to overcome the drawbacks of linear methods (Goel, Bapat, Vyas, Tambe, & Tambe, ; Iquebal et al, ; Khoshnevisan, Rafiee, & Mousazadeh, ; Samadianfard, Nazemi, & Ashraf Sadraddini, ; Silva et al, ; Zeng, Xu, Wu, & Huang, ). In the last few decades, ANN have been widely used to predict SY in different crops like soybean, corn (Kaul, Hill, & Walthall, ), rice (Ji, Sun, Yang, & Wan, ), wheat (Alvarez, ), barley (Gholipour, Rohani, & Torani, ), sunflower (Zeng et al, ), and sesame (Emamgholizadeh, Parsaeian, & Baradaran, ) as well as genomic selection (Yong‐Jun, Lei, Wang, & Chang‐Hong, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steps (ii) to (iv) are performed iteratively (see the flowchart in Figure 2) until a best-fitting candidate solution (expression) is secured. An in-depth treatment of the GPSR procedure can be found in several studies [24][25][26][27] .…”
Section: Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details of the GP-based SR method and its implementation procedure can be found in, for example, Ghugare et al (2014), Goel et al (2015), Poli et al (2008), and Vyas et al (2015).…”
Section: Experimental Data and Need For Nonlinear Aft Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%