2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Regulatory Mechanisms of Smooth Muscle Cells Map to Coronary Artery Disease Risk Loci

Abstract: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death globally. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified more than 95 independent loci that influence CAD risk, most of which reside in non-coding regions of the genome. To interpret these loci, we generated transcriptome and whole-genome datasets using human coronary artery smooth muscle cells (HCASMCs) from 52 unrelated donors, as well as epigenomic datasets using ATAC-seq on a subset of 8 donors. Through systematic comparison with publicly… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
89
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
5
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have extended these studies to investigate the causality and directionality of the SMAD3 gene in CAD with three additional strategies. First, we assessed gene expression at the putative causal variant rs17293632 with disease relevant eQTL data from human coronary artery smooth muscle cells [ 59 ], and found that the risk C allele increases expression of SMAD3 ( p <0.05), indicating SMAD3 is a CAD promoting transcription factor and suggesting that this gene is active in this cell type in vivo ( Fig 5A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We have extended these studies to investigate the causality and directionality of the SMAD3 gene in CAD with three additional strategies. First, we assessed gene expression at the putative causal variant rs17293632 with disease relevant eQTL data from human coronary artery smooth muscle cells [ 59 ], and found that the risk C allele increases expression of SMAD3 ( p <0.05), indicating SMAD3 is a CAD promoting transcription factor and suggesting that this gene is active in this cell type in vivo ( Fig 5A ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having recently established the likely causality of SMAD3 for CAD [ 11 ], the overall goal of the work reported here was to determine the mechanism and direction of effect for this gene, and thus integrate it into a causal framework that regulates disease pathophysiology. We have demonstrated with various genetic and genomic approaches that a significant portion of the genetic risk for CAD resides in the smooth muscle cell lineage and that the TGFβ pathway in particular regulates genomic features in disease loci, and have thus focused here on HCASMC [ 11 , 59 ]. These studies confirm previous work in other SMC models that SMAD3 promotes a differentiation program in these cells, as evidenced by upregulation of lineage markers [ 22 , 61 , 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xiao et al performed a meta-analysis and found that the leptin rs7799039 variant might affect individual susceptibility to CAD [4]. Liu et al identified five genes (encoding signal-induced proliferation-associated 1, transcription factor 21, SMAD family member 3, FES proto-oncogene, and platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha) that might modulate CAD risk through human coronary artery smooth muscle cells, with all genes having relevant functional roles in vascular remodeling [5]. Furthermore, Li et al provided additional evidence that a genetic variation in the platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1-encoding gene, namely rs1867624, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 subunit alpha gene, namely rs2057482, can modulate lipid levels in myocardial infarction patients [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the collection and sampling process of tissue samples from organs does not allow precise control over cell representation, adding a major source of biological variability in addition to other technical variation (McCall et al 2016). However, other than for immune cells (Kim-Hellmuth et al 2017), induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSC) (Kilpinen et al 2017), or smooth muscle cells (Liu et al 2018), eQTL data sets representing single primary cell types and direct comparison of these to the tissue type of origin have been lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%