2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0953756201005494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic relationships of endophytic Lophodermium nitens isolates from needles of Pinus strobus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Baayen et al ( 2002 ) used molecular biological analysis and showed the identity of a cosmopolitan endophyte, Guignardia mangiferae , with nonpathogenic isolates of the citrus black spot fungus G. citricarpa . Similarly, the identity of endophytes in live leaves and saprobes in dead leaves of single tree species was confi rmed by DNA sequence analyses (Müller et al 2001 ;Deckert et al 2002 ;Promputtha et al 2007 ;Osono et al 2013 ). Host (birch) genotypes infl uenced the probability of infection by, and the genotypes and genetic diversity of, an endophyte, Venturia ditricha (Ahlholm et al 2002b ).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast, Baayen et al ( 2002 ) used molecular biological analysis and showed the identity of a cosmopolitan endophyte, Guignardia mangiferae , with nonpathogenic isolates of the citrus black spot fungus G. citricarpa . Similarly, the identity of endophytes in live leaves and saprobes in dead leaves of single tree species was confi rmed by DNA sequence analyses (Müller et al 2001 ;Deckert et al 2002 ;Promputtha et al 2007 ;Osono et al 2013 ). Host (birch) genotypes infl uenced the probability of infection by, and the genotypes and genetic diversity of, an endophyte, Venturia ditricha (Ahlholm et al 2002b ).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is therefore of primary importance that the sequences deposited in reference databases are accurate and reliable. Recently, a few reports have questioned the identity of some fungal data (Deckert et al ., 2002; Crous, 2002) and highlighted the accumulation of chimeric bacterial 16S sequences in public access databases (Hugenholtz & Huber, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identity of some fungal DNA sequences deposited in public databases has recently been contested (Deckert et al ., 2002; Crous, 2002) and, as a result, there is a need to determine if such reports reveal a widespread phenomenon. In this study we show that up to 20% of publicly available, taxonomically important DNA sequences for three randomly chosen groups of fungi may be incorrectly named, chimeric, of poor quality or too incomplete for reliable comparison.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identity of some fungal DNA sequences deposited in public databases has recently been contested (Crous 2002, Decket et al. 2002), and as a result, there is a need to determine whether such reports reveal a widespread phenomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%