“…The low detection rates of G/P-nontypeable strains compared to those reported by some other studies, particularly compared to those in our previous report, may be attributed to differences in the RT-PCR assay that we employed, such as the use of more sensitive enzymes and the addition of both G12-specific primers and an alternate set of consensus primers (1,15). Our observation of a high percentage of unusual rotavirus strains was in agreement with data from several other studies from the Indian subcontinent (3,13,18,26,27). Additionally, genomic diversity among the regionally common rotavirus strains (G9P [6] and G2P [6]), particularly in regard to the migration pattern of various gene segments, could be attributed to a close association of humans with domesticated animals and/or a frequent occurrence of mixed infections (5, 14, 17, 21-24, 27, 32, 54).…”