1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01948.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation in testcrosses of European maize inbreds for resistance to the European corn borer and relations to line per se performance

Abstract: The European com borer (ECB) Ostrinia nubilalis H. is a major pest in World maize Zea mays L. production. Objectives of this study were to (1) investigate the genotypic variance and covariance in testcrosses of European flint and dent inbreds for ECB resistance and agronomic traits, and (2) estimate the correlation between line per se and testcross performance for ECB resistance traits. A total of 16 flint and 24 dent inbreds and their testcrosses with two testers from the opposite germplasm pool were evaluate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The very strong estimates of r g (LP, GCA) for DTS (0.97) and DMC (0.94) are in accordance with the preponderance of additive gene action reported to be present for DTS (Buckler et al 2009) and DMC in forage maize (Lübberstedt et al 1997). High estimate of r g (LP, GCA) for PHT (0.80) agrees with earlier results on forage (Kreps et al 1998) and grain maize (Mihaljevic et al 2005). Concentrations of fat, starch, ADF, and ADL, which had estimates of r g (LP, GCA) intermediate to those of DTS and DMY (0.81-0.89), were largely determined by the ear proportion and, therefore, also by DTS.…”
Section: Correlations Among Traitssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The very strong estimates of r g (LP, GCA) for DTS (0.97) and DMC (0.94) are in accordance with the preponderance of additive gene action reported to be present for DTS (Buckler et al 2009) and DMC in forage maize (Lübberstedt et al 1997). High estimate of r g (LP, GCA) for PHT (0.80) agrees with earlier results on forage (Kreps et al 1998) and grain maize (Mihaljevic et al 2005). Concentrations of fat, starch, ADF, and ADL, which had estimates of r g (LP, GCA) intermediate to those of DTS and DMY (0.81-0.89), were largely determined by the ear proportion and, therefore, also by DTS.…”
Section: Correlations Among Traitssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Estimates of r g between LP and TP depend on the predominant type of gene action (Hallauer and Miranda 1988;Mihaljevic et al 2005;Smith 1986) and, therefore, vary for different traits. For forage maize, correlations between LP and TP for DMY, days to silking (DTS) and various quality traits ranged from moderate to strong (Argillier et al 1995;Gurrath et al 1991;Kreps et al 1998;Seitz et al 1992). Thus, estimates of r g between LP and TP for novel traits like MFY and MY, which are important for biogas maize, are needed to develop optimum breeding strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a set of 16 European flint and 24 dent lines, correlations between per se and TC performance were high for stalk damage ratings, but low for tunnel length and yield reduction caused by larvae feeding (Kreps et al 1998). In tropical maize the association between per se and TC performance was low for corn borer resistance (Thome et al 1992).…”
Section: Consistency Of Qtl For Per Se and Tc Performancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…This tester was selected based on its high level of susceptibility to ECB larvae feeding combined with otherwise good agronomic performance (Schulz et al 1997). In the case of a susceptible tester, specific interactions of the tester and segregating alleles facilitate the detection of new QTL (Kreps et al 1998). In addition, this finding might be due to the low power of QTL detection in the per se and TC evaluations as a result of the relatively small population size (N<210), the low to moderate heritabilities for the evaluated ECB resistance traits, and the fact that per se and TC evaluations were performed in different environments.…”
Section: Consistency Of Qtl For Per Se and Tc Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation