2022
DOI: 10.2147/clep.s367547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetically Predicted Serum Albumin and Risk of Colorectal Cancer: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

Abstract: Purpose Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third–most frequently diagnosed cancer globally. Studies have linked low serum albumin with increased risk of CRC, but the causal nature of the association remains unclear. In the present study, we explored the potential causal relationship using bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods Instrumental variants for albumin were obtained from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on 102,223 Eastern Asian participants to inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Mendelian randomization (MR) method is a common approach in causality research, which is similar to randomized controlled trials and is a natural randomized trial (17)(18)(19)(20)(21). The application of the MR method has three basic prerequisites: (a) instrumental variables, namely gene polymorphism, are closely related to exposure factors; (b) instrumental variables should be independent of any exposure confounders; (c) the association between instrumental variables and research outcomes only exists through exposure factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mendelian randomization (MR) method is a common approach in causality research, which is similar to randomized controlled trials and is a natural randomized trial (17)(18)(19)(20)(21). The application of the MR method has three basic prerequisites: (a) instrumental variables, namely gene polymorphism, are closely related to exposure factors; (b) instrumental variables should be independent of any exposure confounders; (c) the association between instrumental variables and research outcomes only exists through exposure factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%