1983
DOI: 10.1086/337372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetics and Comparative Growth Morphology of Fasciation in Soybeans (Glycine max [L.] Merr.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Seventy percent of the pods are located at the top of the main stem in fasciated soybean (Wongyai et al, 1984). The soybean fasciation trait is controlled by a single recessive gene (White, 1945;Albertsen et al, 1983;Wongyai et al, 1984;Leffel, et al, 1993;Tang and Skorupska, 1997). In both normal and fasciated subtypes of determinate-type soybeans, the fl owering duration is shorter than that in the indeterminate type (Yoshida et al, 1983;Foley et al, 1986;Saitoh et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seventy percent of the pods are located at the top of the main stem in fasciated soybean (Wongyai et al, 1984). The soybean fasciation trait is controlled by a single recessive gene (White, 1945;Albertsen et al, 1983;Wongyai et al, 1984;Leffel, et al, 1993;Tang and Skorupska, 1997). In both normal and fasciated subtypes of determinate-type soybeans, the fl owering duration is shorter than that in the indeterminate type (Yoshida et al, 1983;Foley et al, 1986;Saitoh et al, 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good fit for 3 : 1 ratio was observed for normal and fasciated plant in all the five crosses (Table 3) ciation was also reported to be recessive and monogenically controlled in pea (Scheibe 1954), pigeonpea (Bhatnagar et al 1967, Sinha et al 1976, chickpea (Knights 1993), soybean (Albertsen et al 1983) and lintil (Tyagi and Gupta 1991). However, Lamprecent (1952) suggested that two genes control stem fasciation in pea.…”
Section: Figs 1-8 Cytomorphology Of Fasciated Mutant and Its Normalmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Such agronomically inferior yields have been reported in the spontaneous fasciated mutants of chickpea (Knights 1993), pigeonpea (Bhatnagar et al 1967, Sinha et al 1976) and mungbean (Singh 1981) and in induced fasciated mutants of chickpea (Gaur and Gour 1999) and all these mutants were also late in maturity. The number of seeds per fruit and seed size both in the fasciated mutant and the corresponding normal plant of soybean was found to be more or less similar, although the mutant flowered late (Albertsen et al 1983). Neverthless, agronomically superior yields were reported in fasciated mutants of pea (Gottschalk 1977, Gottschalk andWolff 1977) and lentil (Tyagi and Gupta 1991) possibly due to increase in the number of branches, flowers and pods per plant, higher biological yield, higher harvest index and higher seed yield per plant.…”
Section: Figs 1-8 Cytomorphology Of Fasciated Mutant and Its Normalmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, biomass partitioning has been examined in a fasciated stem soybean, Shakujo, in which the architecture is modified to shift the spatial locations of the sources and sinks, although this genotype has not been intensively studied in terms of biomass and grain production (Albertsen et al, 1983). It seems that the peculiar architecture of the genotype precludes mutual shading under constraints of population density stress and is congenial for easy flow of assimilates to sink from the source, in comparison with common cultivars of Japan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%