2014
DOI: 10.17161/scn.1808.14331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetolingvistična klasifikacija vzhodnoslovanskih jezikov

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Croatian and Slovenian are very closely related South Slavic languages (Comrie, Matthews and Polinsky 1999;Šekli 2013), but during their historical development they came under the influence of various other languages and various language policies determined by the broader framework of Hungary and Austria (Weber 2013). This fact makes the comparative study of exonymization in both languages very interesting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Croatian and Slovenian are very closely related South Slavic languages (Comrie, Matthews and Polinsky 1999;Šekli 2013), but during their historical development they came under the influence of various other languages and various language policies determined by the broader framework of Hungary and Austria (Weber 2013). This fact makes the comparative study of exonymization in both languages very interesting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%