Albumin immunology is used both to determine species relationships within the bat genera Micronycteris, Phyllostomus, and Tonatia, and to evaluate whether or not these genera are monophyletic. Species of Tonatia are immunologically very divergent and represent several distinct lineages. The albumin data cannot confirm the monophyly of this genus. Tonatia bidens is divergent chromosomally, electrophoretically, and immunologically, and the albumins suggest that this species is as divergent from other species of Tonatia as it is from Phyllostomus. Phyllostomus is monophyletic with Phylloderma fitting well within the Phyllostomus clade. Although Micronycteris is monophyletic, the genus consists of several lineages which may represent ancient divergences. The degree of divergence among Micronycteris species plus the fact that Micronycteris albumins have changed little with respect to other phyllostomid genera makes the determination of species relationships difficult.The subfamily Phyllostominae consists of 11 genera of New World leaf-nosed bats. Comparisons of these 11 genera with representatives of the other five subfamilies suggest that the Phyllostominae is paraphyletic. Chromosomal (Patton and Baker, 1978; R. J. Baker, pers. comm.), morphological (Hood and Smith, 1982), and immunological data (Honeycutt, 1981) indicate at least two groups of phyllostomine genera. The subfamilies Carolliinae, Stenoderminae, Glossophaginae, and Brachyphyllinae associate with one phyllostomine clade (Phyllostomus/Tonatia) which contains Lonchorhina, Macrophyllum, Mimon, and Phylloderma, and the genera Chrotopterus, Macrotus, Micronycteris, Trachops, and Vampyrum represent another distinct group of phyllostomines. Although the immunological data provide a clear association among Chrotopterus, Trachops, and Vampyrum with Macrotus and Micronycteris representing distinct and divergent lineages, the chromosomal and morphological data are less equivocal.Unlike most phyllostomine genera which consist of only one or two species, Micronycteris, Phyllostomus, and Tonatia each have several species. Micronycteris and Tonatia species can be markedly divergent from one another both chromosomally (Patton and Baker, 1978) and electrophoretically (Arnold et aI., 1983), and certain species have undergone "karyotypic megaevolution" to such a degree that obvious congeneric chromosomal homologies are lacking (Baker and Bickham, 1980). In addition, at least two species of Tonatia do not associate with their congeners electrophoretically. Phyllostomus species and Phylloderma are quite similar to one another chromosomally (Patton and Baker, 1978), but few, if any, data bearing on interspecific relationships exist.In light of the existing information on species relationships within Tonatia, Micronycteris, and Phyllostomus, the question as to whether or not these genera are monophyletic needs to be addressed. We have used albumin immunology to test for monophyly and our results as to phylogenetic relationships are compared to those suggested by other data.
M...