1983
DOI: 10.1016/0305-1978(83)90067-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genic differentiation and phylogenetic relationships within two New World bat genera

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Arnold et al [44] argue that, compared to their congeners, Micronycteris hirsuta has undergone extensive and independent karyotypic changes, which has been supported by other authors [3,12,13]. Our results corroborate the hypothesis of karyotypic megaevolution within Micronycteris , and strong evidence for this is that the entire chromosome complement of M. hirsuta proved to be derivative with respect to species compared in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Arnold et al [44] argue that, compared to their congeners, Micronycteris hirsuta has undergone extensive and independent karyotypic changes, which has been supported by other authors [3,12,13]. Our results corroborate the hypothesis of karyotypic megaevolution within Micronycteris , and strong evidence for this is that the entire chromosome complement of M. hirsuta proved to be derivative with respect to species compared in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…), though it is unlikely, in view of the quite distinct ways that T. schulzi and T. bidens albumins are viewed by each of the antisera, that this karyotypic character is synapomorphic for the two. Electrophoretic data also show T. bidens and T. schulzi as highly divergent as they share no derived alleles either with each other or with any other Tonatia species (Arnold et al, 1983). Nonetheless, in light of the strong morphological similarities betwen T. bidens and other Tonatia species (Genoways and Williams, 1984;Goodwin, 1942), we still think it best to refrain from overinterpreting these results, though we do think it quite likely that future studies will support the phylogenetic placements derived here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Interestingly enough, the two new Periglischrus species, although belonging to the different phenetic branches acutisternus and torrealbai, are found on two species of the same large group of Tonatia. The morphological differences in these mites support that the size-based arrangement of Tonatia does not correspond to a natural group, as an allozyme-based study has suggested (Arnold et al 1993). In fact, small and large bat species share external and cranial characters: e.g., T. silvicola (large) and T. brasiliense (small) show a similar marked postorbital constriction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%