1995
DOI: 10.1128/aem.61.12.4441-4447.1995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome analysis of Clostridium botulinum type A by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Abstract: Genomic DNA from type A Clostridium botulinum was digested with restriction endonucleases that cut at rare sites, and the large fragments were separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Of 15 restriction enzymes tested, MluI, RsrII, SmaI, NruI, KspI, NaeI, and XhoI generated satisfactory digestion patterns of genomic DNA of various C. botulinum strains, enabling the use of the method for genomic fingerprinting. The genomes of four group I (type A) C. botulinum strains examined had similar restriction patte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact was probably related to the formation of larger pores increasing the diffusion of enzymes, reagents and detergents which led to obtaining high purity DNA. It was also observed in this study that three proteinase K treatments led to agarose inserts becoming more translucent (suggesting efficient protein degradation by enzymes and thereby leading to obtaining DNA which had no remaining proteins), whilst one or two treatments were not enough to obtain suitable DNA (Wilkinson and Young, 1993;Lin and Johnson, 1995;Hielm et al 1998).…”
Section: Genome Size Measurement and Pfgesupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This fact was probably related to the formation of larger pores increasing the diffusion of enzymes, reagents and detergents which led to obtaining high purity DNA. It was also observed in this study that three proteinase K treatments led to agarose inserts becoming more translucent (suggesting efficient protein degradation by enzymes and thereby leading to obtaining DNA which had no remaining proteins), whilst one or two treatments were not enough to obtain suitable DNA (Wilkinson and Young, 1993;Lin and Johnson, 1995;Hielm et al 1998).…”
Section: Genome Size Measurement and Pfgesupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The DNA preparations were digested with restriction endonucleases, electrophoresed through agarose gels, blotted onto nylon membranes, and hybridized with specific probes as described previously (8). PFGE was performed as described previously (8,9) at 180 V for 18 h, with a ramped pulse time of 0.5-10 s for BamHI, PvuII, and NdeI digests, and at 200 V for 22 h, and a ramped pulse time of 1-40 s for SmaI or XhoI digests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we tried a method which prevents DNA degradation by adding a free radical scavenger such as thiourea to the PFGE buffer (18), the DNA banding patterns were not obtained in this study. We further examined the formaldehyde fixation method (12), and heat treatment (22,24). However, the DNA banding patterns were not obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the further discrimination of the isolates that showed an indefinite banding pattern in the PFGE gels, we used 3 different methods including the formaldehyde fixation method (12), addition of 50 or 100 µM thiourea into the PFGE buffer (18) and heat treatment for 10 min at 50 C to inactivate DNase activity before embedding in a low-melting agarose (22,24).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%