2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genome ARTIST_v2—An Autonomous Bioinformatics Tool for Annotation of Natural Transposons in Sequenced Genomes

Abstract: The annotation of transposable elements (transposons) is a very dynamic field of genomics and various tools assigned to support this bioinformatics endeavor have been developed and described. Genome ARTIST v1.19 (GA_v1.19) software was conceived for mapping artificial transposons mobilized during insertional mutagenesis projects, but the new functions of GA_v2 qualify it as a tool for the mapping and annotation of natural transposons (NTs) in long reads, contigs and assembled genomes. The tabular export of map… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GA_v2 runs with bash scripts that allow for the extraction of TIRs from contigs along with their flanking sequence (the sequence in the immediate vicinity of the transposon), which is elemental for the mapping of each NT. We collected 3000 nucleotides long flanking sequences using parameters described elsewhere [ 21 ]. The extracted sequences are represented as Junction Queries (JQs) because they represent genome–transposon junctions and were used as queries in WF2 from GA_v2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GA_v2 runs with bash scripts that allow for the extraction of TIRs from contigs along with their flanking sequence (the sequence in the immediate vicinity of the transposon), which is elemental for the mapping of each NT. We collected 3000 nucleotides long flanking sequences using parameters described elsewhere [ 21 ]. The extracted sequences are represented as Junction Queries (JQs) because they represent genome–transposon junctions and were used as queries in WF2 from GA_v2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the insertions with TSDs ( Supplementary Table S3 ) were PCR checked, and the obtained amplicons were migrated in agarose gel ( Supplementary Figure S1 ). Some of the tested insertions were identified using the Canu assembly analyzed in this paper, while three other P-element insertions (in Ac13E , in retn and near stv ) with identical TSDs were identified in alternative assemblies described elsewhere [ 21 , 24 ]. The PCR primers are specific to the sequences that flank the insertions of the P elements ( Supplementary Table S1 ) and together with the MM11 primer (specific for TIRs of the P-element) were used to amplify the genome–transposon junction, thus testing the presence of the insertions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparative analysis considered the evaluation of the total content in NTs with RepeatMasker version 4.1.2 (relying on rmblastn version 2.10.0+ and CONS-Dfam_withRBRM_3.3) [ 19 ]. We also mapped mdg1 retroelement (an LTR transposon from the Gypsy group) in these assemblies using Genome ARTIST (GA_v2) software [ 20 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to test this assumption, we considered mdg1 retroelement, since it is potentially active and may occur as full-length copies in the genome of D. melanogaster [ 22 , 23 ]. The mapping was performed with GA_v2 tool, using a strategy described elsewhere [ 20 ]. The majority of mdg1 insertions were mapped at nucleotide level relative to the D. melanogaster reference genome (r6.48), either in intergenic regions or in specific genes ( Tables S3–S7 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation